5 point scale

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

5 point scale

Peter Spangler
I realize this is a direct statistics question and I have googled for options, however, I believe this forum is a richer source. When handling 5 point scale variables for an audience whose interpretive sensibility is for the standard 10 point, how best do you all like to respond when presenting descriptives? Maybe it is best to stick with tests and linear models/


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5 point scale

henryilian

I’ve been reporting on descriptives based on five-point scales for many years, and I simply note in the narrative that the ratings were on a five-point scale. When there are anchors, I indicate what they are. It doesn’t seem to have caused any confusion.

 

Wouldn’t it be necessary for people to know that you are using a five-point scale even if you are reporting on tests and linear models? It explains what the data are about and what the cognitive task was that your subjects were presented with.

 

Best,

 

Henry

 

From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Peter Spangler
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:21 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: 5 point scale

 

I realize this is a direct statistics question and I have googled for options, however, I believe this forum is a richer source. When handling 5 point scale variables for an audience whose interpretive sensibility is for the standard 10 point, how best do you all like to respond when presenting descriptives? Maybe it is best to stick with tests and linear models/

 

 



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication, and any attachments, contains confidential and privileged information for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5 point scale

Peter Spangler
Henry, I certainly agree. I always present the context the respondent is asked to address first. I have had managers frequently sort of indicating being unmoved by the scale as much as a 10 point scale despite models. Maybe it is that I'm not in an academic context.


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Ilian, Henry (ACS) <[hidden email]> wrote:

I’ve been reporting on descriptives based on five-point scales for many years, and I simply note in the narrative that the ratings were on a five-point scale. When there are anchors, I indicate what they are. It doesn’t seem to have caused any confusion.

 

Wouldn’t it be necessary for people to know that you are using a five-point scale even if you are reporting on tests and linear models? It explains what the data are about and what the cognitive task was that your subjects were presented with.

 

Best,

 

Henry

 

From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Peter Spangler
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:21 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: 5 point scale

 

I realize this is a direct statistics question and I have googled for options, however, I believe this forum is a richer source. When handling 5 point scale variables for an audience whose interpretive sensibility is for the standard 10 point, how best do you all like to respond when presenting descriptives? Maybe it is best to stick with tests and linear models/

 

 



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication, and any attachments, contains confidential and privileged information for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.