|
Hi Listers
I am trying to understand the implications of these two different UNIANOVA specifications. In the first I have a one way anova with covariate and specify the interaction of the factor A and the covariate B in the DESIGN statement. In the second I use a computed interaction term which I specify in the opening covariate list as well as the DESIGN statement. The second specification gives me results equivalent to using REGRESSION rather than UNIANOVA and I can easily interpret the results. The first specification gives me a very different result for the main effect of A - not sure why and not sure how to interpret the meaning of the result. Title Interaction term as cross product in design. UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B /CONTRAST(A)=Simple /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /PRINT=PARAMETER /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=A B A*B. Title interaction term as covariate. compute AtimesB=A*B. UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B AtimesB /CONTRAST(A)=Simple /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /PRINT=PARAMETER /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=A B AtimesB. Thanks in advance. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Administrator
|
Please post your REGRESSION syntax too.
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
