ANOVA Design question

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

ANOVA Design question

Roy Money
Hi Listers

I am trying to understand the implications of these two different
UNIANOVA specifications.
In the first I have a one way anova with covariate and specify the
interaction of the  factor A and the covariate B in the DESIGN statement.
In the second I  use a computed interaction term which I specify in the
opening covariate list as well as the DESIGN statement.

The second specification gives me results equivalent to using REGRESSION
rather than UNIANOVA and I can easily interpret the results.
The first specification gives me a very different result for the main
effect of A - not sure why and not sure how to interpret the meaning of
the result.


Title Interaction term as cross product in design.
UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B
   /CONTRAST(A)=Simple
   /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
   /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
   /PRINT=PARAMETER
   /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
   /DESIGN=A B A*B.

Title interaction term as covariate.
compute  AtimesB=A*B.
UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B AtimesB
   /CONTRAST(A)=Simple
   /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
   /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
   /PRINT=PARAMETER
   /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
   /DESIGN=A B AtimesB.

Thanks in advance.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ANOVA Design question

Bruce Weaver
Administrator
Roy Money wrote
Hi Listers

I am trying to understand the implications of these two different
UNIANOVA specifications.
In the first I have a one way anova with covariate and specify the
interaction of the  factor A and the covariate B in the DESIGN statement.
In the second I  use a computed interaction term which I specify in the
opening covariate list as well as the DESIGN statement.

The second specification gives me results equivalent to using REGRESSION
rather than UNIANOVA and I can easily interpret the results.
The first specification gives me a very different result for the main
effect of A - not sure why and not sure how to interpret the meaning of
the result.


Title Interaction term as cross product in design.
UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B
   /CONTRAST(A)=Simple
   /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
   /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
   /PRINT=PARAMETER
   /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
   /DESIGN=A B A*B.

Title interaction term as covariate.
compute  AtimesB=A*B.
UNIANOVA Y BY A WITH B AtimesB
   /CONTRAST(A)=Simple
   /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
   /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
   /PRINT=PARAMETER
   /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
   /DESIGN=A B AtimesB.

Thanks in advance.

Please post your REGRESSION syntax too.

--
Bruce Weaver
bweaver@lakeheadu.ca
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/

"When all else fails, RTFM."

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 
1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/).