Thanks for the explanation. Actually I´m trying to predict the uppermost instance in a hierarchical model. But I have trouble doing this prediction because of multicollinearity and a lot of missings in the data. As a side effect i´m trying to forecast all other instances in my model as well.
The users of my model should then be in the position to estimate the outcome of the prediction (in terms of the variable that is at the top of the hierarchy) regarding a let`s say 10% increase of the mean on a specific variable. If you or any of the listers have a better approach, I would be glad for assistance Kind regards, Heiko Klemm MRSC Deutsche Post World Net Business Consulting GmbH Market Research Service Center Tulpenfeld 2 53113 Bonn Germany T. +49 228 2435 740 mailto:[hidden email] -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peck, Jon [mailto:[hidden email]] Gesendet: Montag, 7. August 2006 15:01 An: Klemm, Heiko BC/MRSC Betreff: RE: [SPSSX-L] PLS/PLSR I am not a PLS expert, by any means, but the difference between PLS-1 and PLS-2 is that PLS-2 results in one set of scores and one set of eigenvalues while in PLS-1, you get separate scores and eigenvalues for each Y variable. PLS-1 can take significantly longer to calculate, but it will tend to give more accurate predictions. For a single variable, then, there is actually no difference. I am glad that you are enjoying Python. It seems to be addictive. -Jon -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Montag, 7. August 2006 07:35 To: Peck, Jon Subject: AW: [SPSSX-L] PLS/PLSR Dear Jon, I`m not quite sure since I don´t have a great deal of experience with pls, but to put it this way, i think pls-1 should bet be appropriate procedure to make a prediction for on single variable (please correct me if i`m wrong!!!). Thanx again for explaining python to us in munich, I really enjoy exploring it (especially now, where it is running on the german systems ;-) Heiko Klemm MRSC Deutsche Post World Net Business Consulting GmbH Market Research Service Center Tulpenfeld 2 53113 Bonn Germany T. +49 228 2435 740 mailto:[hidden email] -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peck, Jon [mailto:[hidden email]] Gesendet: Montag, 7. August 2006 13:40 An: Klemm, Heiko BC/MRSC Betreff: RE: [SPSSX-L] PLS/PLSR It is interesting that you should ask about this. I am working right now on PLS using Python and scipy. Are you interested in PLS-1 or PLS-2? -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Heiko Klemm Sent: Montag, 7. August 2006 03:26 To: [hidden email] Subject: [SPSSX-L] PLS/PLSR Dear Listers, I wonder if there is a way to compute "partial least square regression" (pls / plsr) in spss, or if anybody knows of another spss procedure that allows to develop prediction models if there is multicollinearity in the data. Kind regards Heiko Klemm MRSC Deutsche Post World Net Business Consulting GmbH Market Research Service Center Tulpenfeld 2 53113 Bonn Germany T. +49 228 2435 740 mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |