|
Hello:
I am writing to solicit your assistance with an ability based survey pilot. Before running SEM on my data I need to run reliability on an ability scale that is scored as right and wrong. I coded the right answer as 1 and the wrong answer as 0. Using split-half reliability the alpha score was about .7 however I received an error concerning violating an assumption due to a negative score. How may I correct this? Also, for the second scale there are 4 responses and for some responses 2 items are correct, 1 partially correct and the 4th option is incorrect, while for others there is one top choice, better choice, acceptable choice and incorrect. Any suggestions for coding and running reliability for this scale? Thanks! -- Kizzy M. Parks, Ph.D Florida Tech ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Since the split half reliability estimate was a shorter hand calculation
method to approximate an alpha, I have never used it since I wrote a FORTRAN program to get an alpha in 1971. see interspersed comments. Kizzy M Parks wrote: > Hello: > I am writing to solicit your assistance with an ability based survey > pilot. Before running SEM on my data I need to run reliability on an > ability scale that is scored as right and wrong. I coded the right answer > as 1 and the wrong answer as 0. Using split-half reliability the alpha > score was about .7 however I received an error concerning violating an > assumption due to a negative score. How may I correct this? > > First I suggest that you check the scoring key. It would be unusual if an ability item correlated negatively with other items on the same measure. If you run RELIABILITY you can see the correlations among the items. The summary of the item correlations will tell you what the value of the lowest interitem correlation is. You can help your search for which items have this score by using <edit> <find> on the output page. If either of those items are in many of the negative cells, those are the best candidate to be mis-keyed. You can also look at the corrected item-total correlations to look for negative signs. > Also, for the second scale there are 4 responses and for some responses 2 > items are correct, 1 partially correct and the 4th option is incorrect, > while for others there is one top choice, better choice, acceptable choice > and incorrect. Any suggestions for coding and running reliability for > this scale? > > try a DO REPEAT 4 lists 1 with the items, and 1 each for the response possibilities. the values some thing like this untested syntax. It this first situation the values to be assigned would be 2, 1, 0 in the second situation the values to be assigned would be 3,2,1,0. compute score =0. DO REPEAT item = item1 to item10 /For_a = 0 3 2 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 /For_b = 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 /For_c = 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 /For_d = 3 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 3 1. do if item eq 'a'. compute score = score + For_a. else if item eq 'b'. compute score = score + For_b. else if item eq 'c'. compute score = score + For_c. else if item eq 'd'. compute score = score + For_d. else, print / 'oops bad response value ID= ' ID item. end if. Art Kendall Social Research Consultants > Thanks! > -- > Kizzy M. Parks, Ph.D > > Florida Tech > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
