I have a conjoint with 16 cards that the respondent ranks from 1 to 16 in
order of preference. Is there an acceptable way to screen out or at least
identify cases where the respondent simply ranks in order 1 to 16 or perhaps
ranks the 1st 4 or 5 "logically" then here comes a sequential ordering? It
would seem that they weren't really interested in doing it right or within
reason (at least to me).
Tks
Will
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Locked
