|
I am trying to determine the appropriate equation to convert a paired sample t-test to Cohen’s d. Rosenthal and Rosnow have published the equation of d = 2t/SQRT(df), which I thought was encompassing of all kinds of t tests. I recently read a paper that for a paired sample t-test another equation attributed to Rosenthal was as follows: d = t/SQRT(df). Can some kind soul point me in the direction of sources and arguments for one or the other or perhaps something totally different. CC’ing my email to replies would be appreciated as I only take the digest of this listserve. Thanks. David Fresco ------ David M. Fresco, Ph.D. fresco@... Department of Psychology Voice: (330) 672-4049 Kent State University Fax: (330) 672-3786 226 Kent Hall Annex P.O. Box 5190 http://dept.kent.edu/psychology/ Kent, OH 44242-0001 http://www.personal.kent.edu/~dfresco/ ListOwner of Helplessness http://psych.upenn.edu/~fresco/helplessness.html Listowner of Mindfulness http://listserv.kent.edu/archives/mindfulness.html |
|
Hi David, The first formula is technically to compute the d for independent
samples (dI) and it is the formula that assumes each group is the
same size (i.e., the equal n formula). The more general formula is: di = 2ti / SQRT[df (p1p2)] where p1 is the proportion of total N in group 1 and p2
is the remainder. The second formula is to compute the d for correlated samples (dC).
It reflects the distance between the two means in SD units, but now the SD
units are based on the SD of the difference scores, not the pooled SD of the
original variable. The SD of the difference scores is a function of the
correlation between the paired observations, with a stronger correlation
generating a smaller SD of the differences. Because the d for correlated observations is in part a function of
power to detect the difference (i.e., the degree of correlation) rather than
magnitude of the difference per se, Cohen noted that dC cannot be
compared to dI. It is also for this reason that some have argued that
dC is typically misleadingly large and so only dI should
be reported. To do so, you would have to compute the independent samples t and
convert it or compute d directly from the group Ms and SDs. This issue is discussed at some length in the following citation: Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J.
(1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures
designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177 But note that the formulas in this article actually compute Hedge’s
g rather than Cohen’s d. (For an explanation of the differences between d
and g, as well as other symbols in the literature to represent standardized
mean differences, see Table 1 in McGrath & Meyer, 2006, “When effect
sizes disagree: The case of r and d”; Psych Methods). Greg From: SPSSX(r) Discussion
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of FRESCO, DAVID Colleagues, |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
