Please can you explain the statement "transformed variables from ordinal in scale". What did you actually do?
Last book:
Oliver, G R (2012) Foundations of the assumed business operations and strategy body of knowledge. Sydney: Darlington Press
> On 10 Nov. 2016, at 09:08, Elona Hasmujaj <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I need another answer. :)
> The main hypothesis of my PHD thesis is finding the correlation between
> internet addiction with loneliness, depression, anxiety and stress. So, I
> transformed variables from ordinal in scale and I've done the Pearson
> correlation. Another analysis that I used in this case (in favor of the
> hypothesis) is t-test, between groups of "addicted and not addicted" in
> relationship with loneliness, depression, anxiety and stress level.
> Could you say me please if I did the right thing?
> Ps. Can I use the Chi-squared correlation too? (with categorial variables)
>
> Thank you!
> Elona
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Correlations-tp5733452.html> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Locked
