Hello, I am getting output that shows different results using custom tables vs crosstabs when weighting is on. The decimal values differ slightly and some cell percentages that should be 0 have a small value in ctables. Could it be that these tools round differently? Any other ideas or solutions to ensure matching results? Using SPSS Statistics v26. Have tried weighting via Weight Cases and Use effective base weight variable. Thank you.
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
I already answered this question on your original post. On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:09 PM s_smith <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello, I am getting output that shows different results using custom tables vs crosstabs when weighting is on. The decimal values differ slightly and some cell percentages that should be 0 have a small value in ctables. Could it be that these tools round differently? Any other ideas or solutions to ensure matching results? Using SPSS Statistics v26. Have tried weighting via Weight Cases and Use effective base weight variable. Thank you. |
In reply to this post by s_smith
Thank you, Jon. My SPSS support rep asked me to post here for further insight. I appreciate your original response and am testing that.
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by s_smith
Location of original post (IBM Developer SPSS Statistics) forum:
https://developer.ibm.com/answers/questions/525158/ctables-rounding-different-than-crosstabs/?smartspace=predictive-analytics ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by s_smith
Where was the original question posted? Please post a link here (if
possible) so that future interested parties who find this thread are privy to all of the relevant information. Thanks. s_smith wrote > Thank you, Jon. My SPSS support rep asked me to post here for further > insight. I appreciate your original response and am testing that. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@.UGA > (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD ----- -- Bruce Weaver [hidden email] http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |