|
Hi, I am new to this list.
I am trying to analyze a relationship between two nominal variables each with more than two levels. I can't use Pearson's Chi-Square because more than 20% of the cells have expected counts less than 5. However, I can't do a Fisher's Exact Test because it's larger than a 2x2 table and SPSS will not allow that unless I get the Exact Tests add-on Module, which I'm not sure I can afford, and I don't even know if it's compatible with my version. Does anyone have any advice about what I could do short of buying the Exact Tests module? Like, would it be okay if I just broke it up into every combination of 2x2, and ran Fisher's Exact Tests? That would be time-consuming but would it be an acceptable thing to do? Bridgette ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Post the table to the list.
Tony Babinec [hidden email] -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bridgette Portman Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 6:58 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Exact Tests in SPSS Hi, I am new to this list. I am trying to analyze a relationship between two nominal variables each with more than two levels. I can't use Pearson's Chi-Square because more than 20% of the cells have expected counts less than 5. However, I can't do a Fisher's Exact Test because it's larger than a 2x2 table and SPSS will not allow that unless I get the Exact Tests add-on Module, which I'm not sure I can afford, and I don't even know if it's compatible with my version. Does anyone have any advice about what I could do short of buying the Exact Tests module? Like, would it be okay if I just broke it up into every combination of 2x2, and ran Fisher's Exact Tests? That would be time-consuming but would it be an acceptable thing to do? Bridgette ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Bridgette Portman
I don't think attaching the table will do any good. This is going to be a
repeated problem with my data, since I have a lot of nominal and ordinal variables that will need to be tested via Chi-Square, and a small sample size, about N=200. I'm asking about what to do in general. Bridgette ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Administrator
|
You can download a 30-day trial version of StatXact from www.cytel.com. That will buy you a little time, at least. I also found one online calculator, although I see nothing that explains exactly which test is being implemented.
http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/exact_NROW_NCOLUMN_form.html Finally, there appears to be a procedure in R that you could use. http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help@r-project.org/msg31808.html HTH.
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
