FW: Rank Biserial correlation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FW: Rank Biserial correlation

Edd Thomson

To Whom This May Concern,

 

I am attempting to calculate the rank-biserial correlation between two sets of data which have been grouped based upon a dichotomous variable. I have used the equation:

 

(mean rank group 1 – mean rank group 2) *2/ N.

 

Does this look correct to you and does ‘N’ refer to the total sample size or the number of paired observations (I have two groups of 42, thus 84 participants in total)?

 

Your help with this matter would be extremely appreciated.

 

Kind regards,

Mr Edd Thomson

 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: Rank Biserial correlation

Mike
Simple answer: Yes.
 
See the following for an example:
 
The original reference that provides this test is:
A Ranking Variable Analogue of Biserial Correlation: Implications for Short-Cut Item Analysis
Gene V. Glass
Journal of Educational Measurement , Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jun., 1965), pp. 91-95
Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1433839
 
N refers to the total number of persons.
 
However, I wonder why you say "paired" since the rank biserial correlation
assumes that the groups are independent (if we represent groups by X,
then X is a dichotomous variable representing the underlying ranking and
is correlated with some continuous variable Y).
 
You should perhaps be more concerned with whether you have ties and
how to deal with them.
 
-Mike Palij
New York University
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:11 PM
Subject: FW: Rank Biserial correlation

To Whom This May Concern,

 

I am attempting to calculate the rank-biserial correlation between two sets of data which have been grouped based upon a dichotomous variable. I have used the equation:

 

(mean rank group 1 – mean rank group 2) *2/ N.

 

Does this look correct to you and does ‘N’ refer to the total sample size or the number of paired observations (I have two groups of 42, thus 84 participants in total)?

 

Your help with this matter would be extremely appreciated.

 

Kind regards,

Mr Edd Thomson