I have used and supported SPSS since 1975 but due to rulings within the University the Computing Centre / IT Services were not allowed to give statistical advice so I have concentrated on data management and charts and graphs and let what little statistical knowledge I had lapse; so when a user presented me with this problem I’m stuck. Please would someone be kind enough to explain the apparent, to him, discrepancies ? I assume it is to do with rounding during the calculations ?
I want to check how SPSS treats the mode average. I have found it can do this (via the frequencies) option but seems to consistently get it wrong – i.e. it always chooses the one after the mode (so if the mode – most frequent – answer was 0 it returns a 1). Compare the mode below for single authored articles with the frequencies data. I am worried the same error is creeping into the medians. For example, for co-authored articles I can’t see how the median (middle) entry could be 1 when 77% odd of the respondents answered 0.
Perhaps I’m misunderstanding the stats, perhaps there is something about the way SPSS is using the data, but I want to make sure there is not a generalised error inflating the stats (which could lead to serious egg on face later!)
Dr Andrew Dilley Lecturer in History http://www.abdn.ac.uk/history/staff/details.php?id=a.dilley
The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683. |
John,
There is only one median -- it is unique. There can be multiple modes, and SPSS tells you, for your data, that this is the case in a note at the bottom of the table.
... Mark Miller
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Lemon, John <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |