|
When I ran the following syntax to exclude 2 cases from analysis, a total 5 cases were selected. The 3 new cases appear as dots in the filter column, not as 0 or 1.
I suspect it is the result of some previous command I have input because the 3 cases are id 97 98 and 99, my missing data codes which I was examining ages ago. Can someone tell me what I have done, and how I can fix it? USE ALL. COMPUTE filter_$=(ID ~= 432 & ID ~= 194). VARIABLE LABEL filter_$ 'ID ~= 432 & ID ~= 194 (FILTER)'. VALUE LABELS filter_$ 0 'Not Selected' 1 'Selected'. FORMAT filter_$ (f1.0). FILTER BY filter_$. EXECUTE . Regards Rhonda ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Can this help?
data list free /ID (F3.0). begin data 100 194 200 300 432 end data. list. compute filter_$=(ID<>194 AND ID<>432). filter by filter_$. list. Luca Mr. Luca MEYER Market research, data analysis & more www.lucameyer.com - Tel: +39.339.495.00.21 -----Messaggio originale----- Da: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] Per conto di Rhonda Boorman Inviato: venerdì 15 febbraio 2008 3.00 A: [hidden email] Oggetto: Filter When I ran the following syntax to exclude 2 cases from analysis, a total 5 cases were selected. The 3 new cases appear as dots in the filter column, not as 0 or 1. I suspect it is the result of some previous command I have input because the 3 cases are id 97 98 and 99, my missing data codes which I was examining ages ago. Can someone tell me what I have done, and how I can fix it? USE ALL. COMPUTE filter_$=(ID ~= 432 & ID ~= 194). VARIABLE LABEL filter_$ 'ID ~= 432 & ID ~= 194 (FILTER)'. VALUE LABELS filter_$ 0 'Not Selected' 1 'Selected'. FORMAT filter_$ (f1.0). FILTER BY filter_$. EXECUTE . Regards Rhonda ======= To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.5/1279 - Release Date: 14/02/2008 18.35 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.5/1279 - Release Date: 14/02/2008 18.35 ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Rhonda Boorman
At 09:00 PM 2/14/2008, Rhonda Boorman wrote:
>When I ran the following syntax, a total 5 cases were selected. The >3 new cases appear as dots in the filter column, not as 0 or 1. > >COMPUTE filter_$=(ID ~= 432 & ID ~= 194). [etc.] >I suspect it is the result of some previous command I have input >because the 3 cases are id 97 98 and 99, my missing data codes which >I was examining ages ago. That's it. If 97 is a missing value for variable "ID", then the value of test ID ~= 432 is 'MISSING', not 'TRUE'. A simple fix (you'll have to do it in syntax) is to use the VALUE function to override user-missing values: COMPUTE filter_$=(VALUE(ID) ~= 432 & VALUE(ID) ~= 194). ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
