|
In the syntax below, "88" should be replaced with another number as a
result of preceeding calculations. CORRESPONDENCE Table = all( 7, 88) /DIMENSIONS = 2 /MEASURE = CHISQ /STANDARDIZE = RCMEAN /NORMALIZATION = SYMMETRICAL /PRINT = TABLE RPOINTS CPOINTS /PLOT = NDIM(1,2) BIPLOT(20) . For instance I precaluclated num_of_vars = number of variables: compute num_of_vars=0. exe. do repeat var=all. compute num_of_vars=num_of_vars+1. end repeat. exe. Now, num_of_vars contains the actual number of variables in the dataset. How can I replace "88" in the syntax above with this value in the num_of_vars variable? I tried to do that through defining macro with arguments, but it doesn't seem to work with values of variables. Can anyone help, please? |
|
--The SPSS module of the Python module has a
SetMacroValue function. That's probably the nicest way to do it, but I can't tell you (yet) how exactly it should be done. --This is another way: get file='C:\Program Files\Spss\Employee data.sav'. n of cases 1. flip. compute dummy = 1. aggregate outfile = * / break = dummy / n = n. print outfile = "d:\temp\number.sps" / "define n_of_vars () " n "!enddefine.". exe. insert file = "d:\temp\number.sps" . exe. display macros. Cheers!! Albert-Jan --- Sasha <[hidden email]> wrote: > In the syntax below, "88" should be replaced with > another number as a > result of preceeding calculations. > > > CORRESPONDENCE Table = all( 7, 88) > /DIMENSIONS = 2 > /MEASURE = CHISQ > /STANDARDIZE = RCMEAN > /NORMALIZATION = SYMMETRICAL > /PRINT = TABLE RPOINTS CPOINTS > /PLOT = NDIM(1,2) BIPLOT(20) . > > > For instance I precaluclated num_of_vars = number of > variables: > > compute num_of_vars=0. > exe. > do repeat var=all. > compute num_of_vars=num_of_vars+1. > end repeat. > exe. > > Now, num_of_vars contains the actual number of > variables in the dataset. > How can I replace "88" in the syntax above with this > value in the > num_of_vars variable? > > I tried to do that through defining macro with > arguments, but it doesn't > seem to work with values of variables. > > Can anyone help, please? > Cheers! Albert-Jan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did you know that 87.166253% of all statistics claim a precision of results that is not justified by the method employed? [HELMUT RICHTER] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
