Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

drfg2008

Someone wants to import data from MS Access into SPSS (Windows7 / 64 bit version / SPSS 19). According to him, SPSS does not import data from MS Access if run on a 64 bit version. SPSS message:

If you run the Windows 64-bit version of SPSS Statistics, you can not read Excel, Access or dBASE database sources, even if they are listed in the list of available database sources. The 32-bit ODBC drivers for these products are not compatible.

Is that correct?

Thanks
Dr. Frank Gaeth

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

David Marso
Administrator
AFAIK: There *ARE* 64 bit drivers available.  Google away Frank.
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

not an spss question - what is an appropriate sample size?

Bibel, Daniel (POL)

I would appreciate some guidance on a sample size question.

 

I work for an agency which collects statistical crime data from local police agencies.  These agencies serve cities/towns which vary in size, and therefore the total number of criminal 'incidents' which they report in a year also vary.

 

I am periodically audited by a higher authority.  This higher authority selects about 10 agencies each time they come to visit.  They have determined that if they audit 300 incidents they will have gotten a 'statistically valid' sample of cases for my state.

 

They then divide these n = 300 into roughly equal number of cases to audit for each of the ten agencies, therefore each agency has about 30 cases examined.

 

However, as stated above, the 10 agencies serve different sized populations and report different numbers of incidents per year.

 

Here are the results of the most recent audit:

 

1st group sampled

Agency

Records Reviewed

Incidents in 2009

 

Errors Found

 

Calculated

Error Rate

% of All Offenses Reviewed

A

55

26941

1

1.8%

0.20%

B

40

306

3

7.5%

13.07%

C

40

3163

1

2.5%

1.26%

D

32

1050

4

12.5%

3.05%

E

32

179

6

18.75%

17.88%

Total

199

31639

15

7.5%

0.63%

2nd group sampled

Agency

Records Reviewed

Incidents in 2009

 

Errors Found

 

Calculated

Error Rate

% of all  incidents reviewed

F

32

200

6

18.75%

16.0%

G

25

174

2

8.0%

14.4%

H

25

9217

3

12.0%

0.3%

I

31

1301

4

12.9%

2.4%

J

27

2673

1

3.7%

1.0%

Total

140

13565

33

23.57%

1.0%

 

 

My question to you all:  is the methodology specified above reasonable? What questions or issues does this methodology suggest – if it is not reasonable.

 

It seems to me that this techniques oversamples cases in agencies with few cases, and undersamples cases in larger agencies.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

Jon K Peck
In reply to this post by drfg2008
At the time that was written, 64-bit drivers were not available.  The MS AccessDatabaseEngine X64 package  is said to contain them now.

Jon Peck (no "h")
Senior Software Engineer, IBM
[hidden email]
new phone: 720-342-5621




From:        drfg2008 <[hidden email]>
To:        [hidden email]
Date:        10/16/2011 10:13 AM
Subject:        [SPSSX-L] Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)
Sent by:        "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]>




Someone wants to import data from MS Access into SPSS (Windows7 / 64 bit
version / SPSS 19). According to him, SPSS does not import data from MS
Access if run on a 64 bit version. SPSS message:

/If you run the Windows 64-bit version of SPSS Statistics, you can not read
Excel, Access or dBASE database sources, even if they are listed in the list
of available database sources. The 32-bit ODBC drivers for these products
are not compatible./

Is that correct?

Thanks

-----
Dr. Frank Gaeth
FU-Berlin

--
View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Importing-from-MS-Access-64-bit-version-tp4907197p4907197.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: not an spss question - what is an appropriate sample size?

Rich Ulrich
In reply to this post by Bibel, Daniel (POL)
I don't know the purpose of their data collection, but it looks
to me as if it is properly designed for an administrative overview.


Someone, overhead, wants to know,
"How accurately are particular agencies reporting their incidents?"

Then they scold everyone with more than 1 error, and schedule
some sort of remediation, or new bosses, for the two agencies with
6 each (unless those successful argue for special circumstances
or unlucky sampling).  Maybe these two have the least-experienced
bosses, since they are among the smallest agencies.  The CI for 5
or more errors, per 30 incidents, does not include "1"; "1" seems
like a viable target.

The summary table will be more useful if it is added correctly.
"23.57%" for the overall error for the second group is obviously
in error, since a summary percentage cannot be larger than *all*
the row-percents that it stands as a summary of.  I didn't check
the other numbers, but 16, not 33, is the total of 6 2 3 4 1.

The result of using samples of 30-each is a summary of agency
performances, and not an accurate estimate of how much error-
free data exists in the state.  Most of that is what you see in
Agency A, all by itself, or A+H.


--
Rich Ulrich


Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:16:07 -0400
From: [hidden email]
Subject: not an spss question - what is an appropriate sample size?
To: [hidden email]

I would appreciate some guidance on a sample size question.

 

I work for an agency which collects statistical crime data from local police agencies.  These agencies serve cities/towns which vary in size, and therefore the total number of criminal 'incidents' which they report in a year also vary.

 

I am periodically audited by a higher authority.  This higher authority selects about 10 agencies each time they come to visit.  They have determined that if they audit 300 incidents they will have gotten a 'statistically valid' sample of cases for my state.

 

They then divide these n = 300 into roughly equal number of cases to audit for each of the ten agencies, therefore each agency has about 30 cases examined.

 

However, as stated above, the 10 agencies serve different sized populations and report different numbers of incidents per year.

 

Here are the results of the most recent audit:

 

1st group sampled

Agency

Records Reviewed

Incidents in 2009

 

Errors Found

 

Calculated

Error Rate

% of All Offenses Reviewed

A

55

26941

1

1.8%

0.20%

B

40

306

3

7.5%

13.07%

C

40

3163

1

2.5%

1.26%

D

32

1050

4

12.5%

3.05%

E

32

179

6

18.75%

17.88%

Total

199

31639

15

7.5%

0.63%

2nd group sampled

Agency

Records Reviewed

Incidents in 2009

 

Errors Found

 

Calculated

Error Rate

% of all  incidents reviewed

F

32

200

6

18.75%

16.0%

G

25

174

2

8.0%

14.4%

H

25

9217

3

12.0%

0.3%

I

31

1301

4

12.9%

2.4%

J

27

2673

1

3.7%

1.0%

Total

140

13565

33

23.57%

1.0%

 

 

My question to you all:  is the methodology specified above reasonable? What questions or issues does this methodology suggest – if it is not reasonable.

 

It seems to me that this techniques oversamples cases in agencies with few cases, and undersamples cases in larger agencies.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

Robert Walker
In reply to this post by drfg2008
Hi,

Using syntax, am able to retrieve MS Access data using 64-bit drivers.

Code snippet using...

GET DATA/TYPE=ODBC/CONNECT=
  "DSN=MS Access Driver;DBQ=C:\Filename.mdb;DriverId=25;"
  "FIL=MS Access;MaxBufferSize=2048;PageTimeout=5;"

...followed by the appropriate /SQL="SELECT ..."

HTH,

Bob Walker
Surveys & Forecasts, LLC
www.safllc.com


-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of drfg2008
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 12:10 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Importing from MS Access (64 bit version)

Someone wants to import data from MS Access into SPSS (Windows7 / 64 bit
version / SPSS 19). According to him, SPSS does not import data from MS
Access if run on a 64 bit version. SPSS message:

/If you run the Windows 64-bit version of SPSS Statistics, you can not read
Excel, Access or dBASE database sources, even if they are listed in the list
of available database sources. The 32-bit ODBC drivers for these products
are not compatible./

Is that correct?

Thanks

-----
Dr. Frank Gaeth
FU-Berlin

--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Importing-from-MS-Access-64-bit-version-tp4907197p4907197.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD