|
Hello,
I ran a linear mixed model with a continuous predictor (within- subject) and a categorical predictor (between-subject; 2 levels coded 0 vs. 1) as fixed effects. The random factors were the random intercept and slope for participants. I would like to test the interaction between the two fixed effects. When I entered the interaction in the model, the coefficient of the continuous predictor was inflated. I think that this inflation could be due to collinearity between the main effects and the interaction. Moreover, p-values for the test of fixed effects differed from p-values for the parameter estimates. How can I test the interaction? Can I test the difference between the parameter estimates for each level of the categorical predictor by using a t-test for independent b? Thank you Gaëlle ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Type II tests and tests of parameter estimates can be different especially when categorical variables are concerned. Have you tried centering your continuous predictor?
Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gaëlle Meert Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 7:24 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Interaction in linear mixed model Hello, I ran a linear mixed model with a continuous predictor (within- subject) and a categorical predictor (between-subject; 2 levels coded 0 vs. 1) as fixed effects. The random factors were the random intercept and slope for participants. I would like to test the interaction between the two fixed effects. When I entered the interaction in the model, the coefficient of the continuous predictor was inflated. I think that this inflation could be due to collinearity between the main effects and the interaction. Moreover, p-values for the test of fixed effects differed from p-values for the parameter estimates. How can I test the interaction? Can I test the difference between the parameter estimates for each level of the categorical predictor by using a t-test for independent b? Thank you Gaëlle ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Gaëlle Meert
If based on Wald test you cannot reject the null hypothesis that the
variability associated with interaction is 0 then you have to use more reliable likelihood-ratio test by finding the difference of -2restricted log-likelihood for the two models (with vs without interaction). The difference has ChiSq distribution with df= df (model1) - df (model2). You can reject hypo that interactions effect is 0 if sig level < 0.05 for example or your preferred sig level. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
