Mc Nemar Test for 1:2 Case-Control ?

[Bruce Weaver]

Excellent point, Art.  

Art Kendall wrote

Such a coarse DV!

Many populations would always have some pain.

[E. Bernardo-2]

n=47 cases, n=47 + 47 controls

On Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:34 PM, Bruce Weaver <[hidden email]> wrote:

Excellent point, Art. 


Art Kendall wrote
> Such a coarse DV!
>
> Many populations would always have some pain.





-----
--
Bruce Weaver
[hidden email]
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/

"When all else fails, RTFM."

NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.

--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Mc-Nemar-Test-for-1-2-Case-Control-tp5731696p5731844.html

Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

[David Marso]

Perhaps Eins would take a moment to write a complete sentence (preferably a paragraph) describing the current status of this thread and what is the current question/issue.  Supplying some overall context might be helpful so we don't have to read through all 47 replies in this disjointed 'communication' to try to figure out what the *H* is going on.  Last I recall it had to with a tiny odds ratio and large Wald.
Maybe even attach the dataset so we can run it rather than these 1 sentence back and forth responses?
--

E. Bernardo-2 wrote

n=47 cases, n=47 + 47 controls

    On Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:34 PM, Bruce Weaver <[hidden email]> wrote:
 

 Excellent point, Art. 


Art Kendall wrote
> Such a coarse DV!
>
> Many populations would always have some pain.





-----
--
Bruce Weaver
[hidden email]
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/

"When all else fails, RTFM."

NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.

--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Mc-Nemar-Test-for-1-2-Case-Control-tp5731696p5731844.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD



=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD