Dear All
I am trying to run a mixed model for repeated measures with post hoc pairwise comparisons - using the following code: DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. MIXED LEA BY Timepoint Cann_Control Study_Code /CRITERIA=CIN(95) MXITER(100) MXSTEP(10) SCORING(1) SINGULAR(0.000000000001) HCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) LCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) PCONVERGE(0.000001, ABSOLUTE) /FIXED=Timepoint Cann_Control Timepoint*Cann_Control | SSTYPE(3) /METHOD=REML /RANDOM=INTERCEPT Study_Code | SUBJECT(Study_Code) COVTYPE(VC) /REPEATED=Timepoint | SUBJECT(Study_Code) COVTYPE(AR1) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Cann_Control*Timepoint) COMPARE (Cann_Control) ADJ (BONFERRONI). The weird thing is, the analysis runs, but the Type III omnibus statistics table is empty in the output - yet the post hoc pairwise comparisons table is populated with values...... I have NO IDEA what could cause this behaviour - so I'm going to post in the raw data for the variables in question below - and hope that somebody can help me troubleshoot this. Here is the data (study code 1st data point = 1, Cann_Control = 1, Timepoint = 1, LEA = 0.00000000000011900 - just to help you align): Study_Code Cann_Control Timepoint LEA 1 1 1 0.000000000011900 1 1 2 0.000000000013000 1 1 3 0.000000000011900 1 1 4 0.000000000011200 2 1 1 0.000000000008550 2 1 2 0.000000000009280 2 1 3 0.000000000007380 2 1 4 0.000000000008330 3 1 1 0.000000000012100 3 1 2 0.000000000012000 3 1 3 0.000000000009510 3 1 4 0.000000000012600 4 1 1 0.000000000007390 4 1 2 0.000000000007930 4 1 3 0.000000000007300 4 1 4 0.000000000007520 5 0 1 0.000000000015246 5 0 2 0.000000000010789 5 0 3 0.000000000011582 5 0 4 0.000000000008112 6 1 1 0.000000000011000 6 1 2 0.000000000012000 6 1 3 0.000000000014300 6 1 4 0.000000000015200 7 0 1 0.000000000008411 7 0 2 0.000000000006268 7 0 3 0.000000000007079 7 0 4 8 1 1 0.000000000006900 8 1 2 0.000000000005100 8 1 3 0.000000000008910 8 1 4 0.000000000009800 9 0 1 0.000000000007354 9 0 2 0.000000000006473 9 0 3 0.000000000004069 9 0 4 0.000000000004469 10 0 1 0.000000000006573 10 0 2 0.000000000006105 10 0 3 0.000000000006937 10 0 4 0.000000000005991 11 0 1 0.000000000005822 11 0 2 0.000000000007360 11 0 3 0.000000000008113 11 0 4 0.000000000009862 12 0 1 0.000000000006451 12 0 2 0.000000000007761 12 0 3 0.000000000009403 12 0 4 0.000000000007942 13 0 1 13 0 2 13 0 3 13 0 4 14 1 1 0.000000000010400 14 1 2 0.000000000012100 14 1 3 0.000000000016300 14 1 4 0.000000000015200 15 1 1 0.000000000017100 15 1 2 0.000000000014200 15 1 3 0.000000000020700 15 1 4 0.000000000015500 16 1 1 0.000000000014100 16 1 2 0.000000000014100 16 1 3 0.000000000012500 16 1 4 0.000000000013200 17 1 1 0.000000000007580 17 1 2 0.000000000008030 17 1 3 0.000000000009200 17 1 4 0.000000000010700 19 0 1 0.000000000007267 19 0 2 0.000000000008529 19 0 3 0.000000000007603 19 0 4 0.000000000009126 21 0 1 0.000000000009077 21 0 2 0.000000000010857 21 0 3 0.000000000010654 21 0 4 0.000000000013857 23 0 1 0.000000000005468 23 0 2 0.000000000005032 23 0 3 0.000000000008667 23 0 4 0.000000000008744 24 0 1 0.000000000007980 24 0 2 0.000000000008061 24 0 3 0.000000000014414 24 0 4 0.000000000009455 ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
I may be misunderstanding your analysis but I'm very surprised 1) to see that study_code, which appears to be the id variable being named on the IV list and 2) to see that there is a random statement used. As I understand your experimental design structure, there were two groups of subects (Cann_Control) and all subjects were assessed by LEA at each of four time points (TimePoint). Subjects weren't assessed by LEA multiple times, e.g., in multiple trials, at each time point were they? If not, then it seems that you have an ordinary one-between (Cann-Control with two levels) and one-within (TimePoint with four levels). You could do this in GLM repeated measures, in Mixed as a growth curve or in mixed as a repeated measures. Perhaps there is something I don't understand but this is how I understand it at this point.
Gene Maguin -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of David Allsop Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 12:58 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Mixed Model Quandry - Can anybody help? Dear All I am trying to run a mixed model for repeated measures with post hoc pairwise comparisons - using the following code: DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. MIXED LEA BY Timepoint Cann_Control Study_Code /CRITERIA=CIN(95) MXITER(100) MXSTEP(10) SCORING(1) SINGULAR(0.000000000001) HCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) LCONVERGE(0, ABSOLUTE) PCONVERGE(0.000001, ABSOLUTE) /FIXED=Timepoint Cann_Control Timepoint*Cann_Control | SSTYPE(3) /METHOD=REML /RANDOM=INTERCEPT Study_Code | SUBJECT(Study_Code) COVTYPE(VC) /REPEATED=Timepoint | SUBJECT(Study_Code) COVTYPE(AR1) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Cann_Control*Timepoint) COMPARE (Cann_Control) ADJ (BONFERRONI). The weird thing is, the analysis runs, but the Type III omnibus statistics table is empty in the output - yet the post hoc pairwise comparisons table is populated with values...... I have NO IDEA what could cause this behaviour - so I'm going to post in the raw data for the variables in question below - and hope that somebody can help me troubleshoot this. Here is the data (study code 1st data point = 1, Cann_Control = 1, Timepoint = 1, LEA = 0.00000000000011900 - just to help you align): Study_Code Cann_Control Timepoint LEA 1 1 1 0.000000000011900 1 1 2 0.000000000013000 1 1 3 0.000000000011900 1 1 4 0.000000000011200 2 1 1 0.000000000008550 2 1 2 0.000000000009280 2 1 3 0.000000000007380 2 1 4 0.000000000008330 3 1 1 0.000000000012100 3 1 2 0.000000000012000 3 1 3 0.000000000009510 3 1 4 0.000000000012600 4 1 1 0.000000000007390 4 1 2 0.000000000007930 4 1 3 0.000000000007300 4 1 4 0.000000000007520 5 0 1 0.000000000015246 5 0 2 0.000000000010789 5 0 3 0.000000000011582 5 0 4 0.000000000008112 6 1 1 0.000000000011000 6 1 2 0.000000000012000 6 1 3 0.000000000014300 6 1 4 0.000000000015200 7 0 1 0.000000000008411 7 0 2 0.000000000006268 7 0 3 0.000000000007079 7 0 4 8 1 1 0.000000000006900 8 1 2 0.000000000005100 8 1 3 0.000000000008910 8 1 4 0.000000000009800 9 0 1 0.000000000007354 9 0 2 0.000000000006473 9 0 3 0.000000000004069 9 0 4 0.000000000004469 10 0 1 0.000000000006573 10 0 2 0.000000000006105 10 0 3 0.000000000006937 10 0 4 0.000000000005991 11 0 1 0.000000000005822 11 0 2 0.000000000007360 11 0 3 0.000000000008113 11 0 4 0.000000000009862 12 0 1 0.000000000006451 12 0 2 0.000000000007761 12 0 3 0.000000000009403 12 0 4 0.000000000007942 13 0 1 13 0 2 13 0 3 13 0 4 14 1 1 0.000000000010400 14 1 2 0.000000000012100 14 1 3 0.000000000016300 14 1 4 0.000000000015200 15 1 1 0.000000000017100 15 1 2 0.000000000014200 15 1 3 0.000000000020700 15 1 4 0.000000000015500 16 1 1 0.000000000014100 16 1 2 0.000000000014100 16 1 3 0.000000000012500 16 1 4 0.000000000013200 17 1 1 0.000000000007580 17 1 2 0.000000000008030 17 1 3 0.000000000009200 17 1 4 0.000000000010700 19 0 1 0.000000000007267 19 0 2 0.000000000008529 19 0 3 0.000000000007603 19 0 4 0.000000000009126 21 0 1 0.000000000009077 21 0 2 0.000000000010857 21 0 3 0.000000000010654 21 0 4 0.000000000013857 23 0 1 0.000000000005468 23 0 2 0.000000000005032 23 0 3 0.000000000008667 23 0 4 0.000000000008744 24 0 1 0.000000000007980 24 0 2 0.000000000008061 24 0 3 0.000000000014414 24 0 4 0.000000000009455 ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |