Hi, I'm using the SPSS 'multivariate linear model' functions in order to
run a regression with multiple dependent variables. I'm more familiar with running regular multiple regression models (eg, with 1 DV), and I have some questions about the two functions compare. Using the SPSS wizard under analyze/GLM/multivariate: 1 - Is there any way to 'control' for certain variables, like you would do if you ran a multiple regression with separate blocks? 2 - If you insert both covariates and fixed factors in the GLM/multivariate analysis, it tests for interactions between the two upon the DVs. I assume that you don't need to create an interaction variable, by multiple the 2 select variables? Additionally, is there any need to center or standardize any variables, similar to what you would do to enter an interaction term into a multiple regression? Thanks Josh ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Josh,
In case you're interested, you could fit a multivariate model employing the MIXED procedure. Suppose you have three dependent variables and two covariates. Structure your dataset in vertical format as: ID Indic x1 x2 y 1 1 24 29 34 1 2 33 26 23 1 3 14 17 57 2 1 11 12 53 2 2 31 10 26 2 3 29 46 72 3 1 28 56 19 3 2 21 34 13 3 3 17 39 62 . . . ...and the following MIXED code will estimate separate intercepts and x1 and x2 slopes for each response. MIXED y BY Indic WITH x1 x2 /FIXED=Indic Indic*x1 Indic*x2 | NOINT SSTYPE(3) /METHOD=REML /PRINT=DESCRIPTIVES SOLUTION /REPEATED=Indic | SUBJECT(ID) COVTYPE(UN). Ryan On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Josh <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, I'm using the SPSS 'multivariate linear model' functions in order to > run a regression with multiple dependent variables. I'm more familiar with > running regular multiple regression models (eg, with 1 DV), and I have > some questions about the two functions compare. Using the SPSS wizard > under analyze/GLM/multivariate: > > 1 - Is there any way to 'control' for certain variables, like you would do > if you ran a multiple regression with separate blocks? > > 2 - If you insert both covariates and fixed factors in the > GLM/multivariate analysis, it tests for interactions between the two upon > the DVs. I assume that you don't need to create an interaction variable, > by multiple the 2 select variables? Additionally, is there any need to > center or standardize any variables, similar to what you would do to enter > an interaction term into a multiple regression? > > Thanks > > Josh > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by Josh
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for your reply, although it looks like this would just apply to a repeated measures design? I just have cross-sectional data. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Josh,
You have repeated measures in the sense that each person is measured on multiple response variables. Notice that the indicator variable ("Indic"), which is linked to each response, is the repeated measures variable. The code I provided accounts for residual correlation due to multiple response variables per person. Multiple time points have not been accounted for in this model. Take a look at these articles for additional information: Wright S.P. Multivariate Analysis Using the MIXED Procedure. Proceedings of SUGI 23, 1998, Paper 229. ThiƩbaut R. et al. Bivariate linear mixed models using SAS proc MIXED. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 69, 2002, 249-256. Ryan On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Josh <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Thanks for your reply, although it looks like this would just apply to a > repeated measures design? I just have cross-sectional data. > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by Josh
Great, thanks for the clafication, code, and references.
Appreciate it, Josh ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by Ryan
Hi Ryan,
What would be the syntax for a set of data from 2 differents groups in which subjects are measured twice (repeated measurements) with separate but correlated variables (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, for ex.)? Basically, this is a problem with temporally and spatially repeated measurements, isn't it? Using the menu of SPSS Linear mixed model, one can specificy a covariance structure (autoregerssive for ex. for temporally repeated measures), but how to specify a second covariance structure (unstructured, for ex.) for spatially repeated measures? Thanks for your help. Frederic |
Fred,
As far as I'm aware, the mixed procedure in SPSS does not offer a spatial covariance structure. An alternative to a spatial covariance type, which technically cannot be wrong, would be to fit an UNstructured type. An UNtructured type may be overkill, however. At any rate, it isn't clear to me how a spatial covariance structure would apply to your situation. You do appear to have a double repeated measures design. Ryan p.s. The MIXED procedure in SAS is capable of EASILY fitting double repeated measures designs as well as accounting for spatial structures. On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:22 AM, fred.0112358 <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > What would be the syntax for a set of data from 2 differents groups in which > subjects are measured twice (repeated measurements) with separate but > correlated variables (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, for ex.)? > > Basically, this is a problem with temporally and spatially repeated > measurements, isn't it? > > Using the menu of SPSS Linear mixed model, one can specificy a covariance > structure (autoregerssive for ex. for temporally repeated measures), but how > to specify a second covariance structure (unstructured, for ex.) for > spatially repeated measures? > > Thanks for your help. > > Frederic > > -- > View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Multivariate-Linear-Model-Regression-tp3415809p3470173.html > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for your input.
Yes a bouble-repeated measured design is the correct way to
describe it: measures are repeated temporally and they are repeated
spatially.
The problem with SPSS is that only type repeated measures can
be specified in SPSS MIXED.
I was just wondering if this limitation is my own or if it is
inherent to the software.
From your comment on SAS, it looks like I should seriously
consider migrating to SAS.
Thanks again for your help.
Frederic From: R B [via SPSSX Discussion] [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:14 AM To: fred.0112358 Subject: Re: Multivariate Linear Model, Regression As far as I'm aware, the mixed procedure in SPSS does not offer a spatial covariance structure. An alternative to a spatial covariance type, which technically cannot be wrong, would be to fit an UNstructured type. An UNtructured type may be overkill, however. At any rate, it isn't clear to me how a spatial covariance structure would apply to your situation. You do appear to have a double repeated measures design. Ryan p.s. The MIXED procedure in SAS is capable of EASILY fitting double repeated measures designs as well as accounting for spatial structures. On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:22 AM, fred.0112358 <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > What would be the syntax for a set of data from 2 differents groups in which > subjects are measured twice (repeated measurements) with separate but > correlated variables (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, for ex.)? > > Basically, this is a problem with temporally and spatially repeated > measurements, isn't it? > > Using the menu of SPSS Linear mixed model, one can specificy a covariance > structure (autoregerssive for ex. for temporally repeated measures), but how > to specify a second covariance structure (unstructured, for ex.) for > spatially repeated measures? > > Thanks for your help. > > Frederic > > -- > View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Multivariate-Linear-Model-Regression-tp3415809p3470173.html > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD If you reply to this email, your message will be
added to the discussion below: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Multivariate-Linear-Model-Regression-tp3415809p3637548.html
To
unsubscribe from Multivariate Linear Model, Regression, click
here.
|
Hi, Fred:
I meant to respond to this post several weeks ago, but I was sidetracked and then totally forgot. Apologies. I think it's possible to fit a doubly repeated measures model to your data employing the MIXED procedure in SPSS. If I were trying to fit such a model via MIXED, I'd structure the data as: ID group time y_indic y 1 1 1 1 24 1 1 2 1 12 1 1 1 2 34 1 1 2 2 17 2 2 1 1 45 2 2 2 1 44 2 2 1 2 21 2 2 2 2 11 3 1 1 1 23 3 1 2 1 17 3 1 1 2 35 3 1 2 2 24 . . . and I'd probably parameterize the model with the following MIXED code: MIXED y BY y_indic group time /FIXED = y_indic y_indic*group y_indic*time y_indic*group*time | NOINT /REPEATED = y_indic*time | SUBJECT(ID) COVTYPE(UN) /PRINT SOLUTION. HTH, Ryan On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:54 AM, fred.0112358 <[hidden email]> wrote: > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > Hi Ryan, > > Thanks for your input. > > Yes a bouble-repeated measured design is the correct way to describe it: > measures are repeated temporally and they are repeated spatially. > > The problem with SPSS is that only type repeated measures can be specified > in SPSS MIXED. > > I was just wondering if this limitation is my own or if it is inherent to > the software. > > From your comment on SAS, it looks like I should seriously consider > migrating to SAS. > > Thanks again for your help. > > Frederic > ________________________________ > From: R B [via SPSSX Discussion] [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:14 AM > To: fred.0112358 > Subject: Re: Multivariate Linear Model, Regression > > Fred, > > As far as I'm aware, the mixed procedure in SPSS does not offer a > spatial covariance structure. An alternative to a spatial covariance > type, which technically cannot be wrong, would be to fit an > UNstructured type. An UNtructured type may be overkill, however. At > any rate, it isn't clear to me how a spatial covariance structure > would apply to your situation. You do appear to have a double repeated > measures design. > > Ryan > > p.s. The MIXED procedure in SAS is capable of EASILY fitting double > repeated measures designs as well as accounting for spatial > structures. > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:22 AM, fred.0112358 <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Ryan, >> >> What would be the syntax for a set of data from 2 differents groups in >> which >> subjects are measured twice (repeated measurements) with separate but >> correlated variables (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, for ex.)? >> >> Basically, this is a problem with temporally and spatially repeated >> measurements, isn't it? >> >> Using the menu of SPSS Linear mixed model, one can specificy a covariance >> structure (autoregerssive for ex. for temporally repeated measures), but >> how >> to specify a second covariance structure (unstructured, for ex.) for >> spatially repeated measures? >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Frederic >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Multivariate-Linear-Model-Regression-tp3415809p3470173.html >> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> ===================== >> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >> command. To leave the list, send the command >> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >> INFO REFCARD >> > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Multivariate-Linear-Model-Regression-tp3415809p3637548.html > here. > ________________________________ > View this message in context: RE: Multivariate Linear Model, Regression > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |