Need help with ANOVA

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Need help with ANOVA

Anita Patel


Hi
 
Require some very simple help. Its not simple to me but I guess its simple to others. I have to do some stat. analysis on the following.I think I need to use 2 way mixed anova. The IV is the students and the DV is the conditions of mimicry.Would this be right? Thanks to any help available. Anita
 

Using the ‘mimicry’ data below I am to  carry out the following:

‘Mimicry’ Data File:

An investigation was carried out to observe mimicry (i.e. of nonverbal behaviour – such as hand gestures and body language etc) between a confederate and participant.  To conduct the observation, participants were asked individually to engage in a discussion about studying psychology and there were 3 conditions – the discussion was positive, negative and neutral (the ordering was randomly assigned; and the discussion was initiated by the confederate). 

 

Furthermore, participants were divided into two – those who were psychology students and those who were not.

 

The data file illustrates the results for 50 students (25 psychology, 25 non-psychology) and the number of times mimicry was observed.

 

The hypothesis is two-tailed that there will be a difference between mimicry in psychology and non-psychology students and the type of discussion.

 

i)        1)Define the research design.

 

ii)      2)Conduct an appropriate statistical analysis (but not use multiple t tests) to assess if there are significant differences between variables, as well as a significant interaction between variables.  Interpret your findings using descriptive statistics where appropriate.

 

iii)    3)If relevant, conduct additional post hoc tests for further analysis.  Interpret  findings.

 

iv)    4)List further research possibilities, and define its research design

T

 

 

1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 11.0 8.0 6.0
1.0 15.0 7.0 2.0
1.0 16.0 7.0 3.0
1.0 24.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 22.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 11.0 8.0 6.0
1.0 15.0 7.0 2.0
1.0 16.0 7.0 3.0
1.0 24.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 22.0 9.0 4.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 7.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 8.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 2.0 4.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 8.0 9.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 7.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 8.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 2.0 4.0 9.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0


 

 




Windows Live just got better. Find out more!

Windows Live Hotmail just got better. Find out more!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help with ANOVA

Richard Ristow
At 12:43 PM 3/2/2009, Anita Patel wrote, including:

>i)     1)Define the research design.
>
>ii)    2)Conduct an appropriate statistical analysis (but not use
>multiple t tests) to assess if there are significant differences
>between variables, as well as a significant interaction between
>variables.  Interpret your findings using descriptive statistics
>where appropriate.
>
>iii)   3)If relevant, conduct additional post hoc tests for further
>analysis.  Interpret  findings.
>
>iv)    4)List further research possibilities, and define its research design

Pardon me, but -- this reads like a class assignment. We like to help
with problems, but not do assignments for people.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help with ANOVA

Arthur Burke
In reply to this post by Anita Patel
This is not an appropriate forum for seeking help with homework.   You should seek help from your instructor.
 
Art
------------------------------------------------------------------

Art Burke
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory
101 SW Main St, Suite 500
Portland, OR 97204-3213

Phone:  503-275-9592 / 800-547-6339

Fax: 503-275-0450

[hidden email] 


From: Anita Patel [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:43 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Need help with ANOVA



Hi
 
Require some very simple help. Its not simple to me but I guess its simple to others. I have to do some stat. analysis on the following.I think I need to use 2 way mixed anova. The IV is the students and the DV is the conditions of mimicry.Would this be right? Thanks to any help available. Anita
 

Using the ‘mimicry’ data below I am to  carry out the following:

‘Mimicry’ Data File:

An investigation was carried out to observe mimicry (i.e. of nonverbal behaviour – such as hand gestures and body language etc) between a confederate and participant.  To conduct the observation, participants were asked individually to engage in a discussion about studying psychology and there were 3 conditions – the discussion was positive, negative and neutral (the ordering was randomly assigned; and the discussion was initiated by the confederate). 

 

Furthermore, participants were divided into two – those who were psychology students and those who were not.

 

The data file illustrates the results for 50 students (25 psychology, 25 non-psychology) and the number of times mimicry was observed.

 

The hypothesis is two-tailed that there will be a difference between mimicry in psychology and non-psychology students and the type of discussion.

i)        1)Define the research design.

ii)      2)Conduct an appropriate statistical analysis (but not use multiple t tests) to assess if there are significant differences between variables, as well as a significant interaction between variables.  Interpret your findings using descriptive statistics where appropriate.

iii)    3)If relevant, conduct additional post hoc tests for further analysis.  Interpret  findings.

iv)    4)List further research possibilities, and define its research design

T

1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 11.0 8.0 6.0
1.0 15.0 7.0 2.0
1.0 16.0 7.0 3.0
1.0 24.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 22.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0
1.0 7.0 5.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 3.0
1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 9.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 11.0 8.0 6.0
1.0 15.0 7.0 2.0
1.0 16.0 7.0 3.0
1.0 24.0 9.0 4.0
1.0 22.0 9.0 4.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 7.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 8.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 2.0 4.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 8.0 9.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 7.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 8.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 2.0 4.0 9.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 7.0
2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0
2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0
2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2.0 5.0 4.0 7.0


 

 



Windows Live just got better. Find out more!

Windows Live Hotmail just got better. Find out more!