Hi,
When I ran a ordinal regression by PLUM functionality in SPSS , for the test of parallel lines, I received this messages "The Chi-Square statistic is computed based on the log-likelihood value of the last iteration of the general model. Validity of the test is uncertain." What does it mean and how to fix this ? Thank you, NJ -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
It almost surely means that the output has some other warning
which says something more. Maybe, "The model fails to converge"
or something like that. Is it that, or something else?
Increasing the number of iterations is an obvious thing to try, though
that won't work if the solution steps are either drifting or cycling.
- It's conceivable to me that by might get a convergence if you
/dropped/ some specific case, if that broke some numerical tie.
I suspect that your N is relatively small compared to the number
of variables in the model, because that's when problems are more
likely. In addition to mentioning your N and number of variables,
you could say whether there /looks like/ there is some (big) effect.
--
Rich Ulrich
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion <[hidden email]> on behalf of NJ1979 <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 11:05 AM To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Ordinal regression Test of parallel lines Hi,
When I ran a ordinal regression by PLUM functionality in SPSS , for the test of parallel lines, I received this messages "The Chi-Square statistic is computed based on the log-likelihood value of the last iteration of the general model. Validity of the test is uncertain." What does it mean and how to fix this ? Thank you, NJ -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
For some kinds of estimation, the exact sampling distribution is
unknown, or is only known asymptotically (which is the case for maximum likelihood estimation). In this case, significance tests are not precise. There is no remedy for this. David Greenberg, Sociology Dept., NYU On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:12 AM Rich Ulrich <[hidden email]> wrote: > > It almost surely means that the output has some other warning > which says something more. Maybe, "The model fails to converge" > or something like that. Is it that, or something else? > > Increasing the number of iterations is an obvious thing to try, though > that won't work if the solution steps are either drifting or cycling. > - It's conceivable to me that by might get a convergence if you > /dropped/ some specific case, if that broke some numerical tie. > > I suspect that your N is relatively small compared to the number > of variables in the model, because that's when problems are more > likely. In addition to mentioning your N and number of variables, > you could say whether there /looks like/ there is some (big) effect. > > -- > Rich Ulrich > > > ________________________________ > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion <[hidden email]> on behalf of NJ1979 <[hidden email]> > Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 11:05 AM > To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> > Subject: Ordinal regression Test of parallel lines > > Hi, > When I ran a ordinal regression by PLUM functionality in SPSS , for the test > of parallel lines, I received this messages > "The Chi-Square statistic is computed based on the log-likelihood value of > the last iteration of the general model. Validity of the test is uncertain." > What does it mean and how to fix this ? > > Thank you, > NJ > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Rich Ulrich
See the documentation for the CRITERIA sub-command for info on how to try
some of the things Rich suggested. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_26.0.0/statistics_reference_project_ddita/spss/advanced/syn_plum_criteria.html Does the same thing happen if you estimate the model via GENLIN rather than PLUM? (When using GENLIN, specify "DISTRIBUTION=MULTINOMIAL LINK=CUMLOGIT" on the /MODEL sub-command.) HTH. Rich Ulrich wrote > It almost surely means that the output has some other warning > which says something more. Maybe, "The model fails to converge" > or something like that. Is it that, or something else? > > Increasing the number of iterations is an obvious thing to try, though > that won't work if the solution steps are either drifting or cycling. > - It's conceivable to me that by might get a convergence if you > /dropped/ some specific case, if that broke some numerical tie. > > I suspect that your N is relatively small compared to the number > of variables in the model, because that's when problems are more > likely. In addition to mentioning your N and number of variables, > you could say whether there /looks like/ there is some (big) effect. > > -- > Rich Ulrich > > > ________________________________ > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion < > SPSSX-L@.UGA > > on behalf of NJ1979 < > drnagesh@ > > > Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 11:05 AM > To: > SPSSX-L@.UGA > < > SPSSX-L@.UGA > > > Subject: Ordinal regression Test of parallel lines > > Hi, > When I ran a ordinal regression by PLUM functionality in SPSS , for the > test > of parallel lines, I received this messages > "The Chi-Square statistic is computed based on the log-likelihood value of > the last iteration of the general model. Validity of the test is > uncertain." > What does it mean and how to fix this ? > > Thank you, > NJ > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@.UGA > (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@.UGA > (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD ----- -- Bruce Weaver [hidden email] http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |