Dear list,
Does anyone know if is it possible to calculate the power of a test of comparison of variances for paired data, and how doing this.. Thanks for your help; Vanessa |
Hi Vanessa
What do you want to do?: - Compute the sample size needed to detect a certain variance ratio as significant with 80% power. - Compute the power of a test given a sample size. PV> Does anyone know if is it possible to calculate the power of PV> a test of comparison of variances for paired data, and how doing PV> this.. Anyway, we must start with the formula for comparison of two variances in paired data: (Fratio-1)*SQRT(n-2) t=----------------------------- 2*SQRT(Fratio*(1-Rsquare)) Replacing t by Z, and after some math work (rearranging terms), we get the following: [(Zalfa/2)*SQRT(F0)-Zbeta*SQRT(F1)]^2 n=2+4*(1-Rsquare)--------------------------------------- (F1-Fo)^2 Being: Rsquare: the square of Pearson correlation between pairs F0: the F ratio under the null hypothesis (usually 1) F1: the F ratio under the alternate hypothesis (the value worth detecting). You must have and idea of its value. Z(alfa/2): A value related to the desired level of significance (1.96 for 5%, and 2.578 for 1%) Zbeta: A value related to the desired power (-0.84 for 80%, -1.28 for 95%). As you can see, you can solve for n (given F1, Zalfa and Zbeta) or for power (given F1, Zalfa and n). -- Regards, Dr. Marta García-Granero,PhD mailto:[hidden email] Statistician --- "It is unwise to use a statistical procedure whose use one does not understand. SPSS syntax guide cannot supply this knowledge, and it is certainly no substitute for the basic understanding of statistics and statistical thinking that is essential for the wise choice of methods and the correct interpretation of their results". (Adapted from WinPepi manual - I'm sure Joe Abrahmson will not mind) |
Hi, I unsubscribed few times, but it never worked! Can somebody please tell me how to unsubscribe? Thank you. |
The instructions were sent you when you subscribed. You must send a message
to [hidden email] and put only the following text in the body of the message: UNSUBSCRIBE SPSSX-L Raghda AlAtia. You may also use the word SIGNOFF instead of the word UNSUBSCRIBE. Hector _____ De: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] En nombre de Raghda AlAtia Enviado el: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:03 AM Para: [hidden email] Asunto: How to unsubscribe Hi, I unsubscribed few times, but it never worked! Can somebody please tell me how to unsubscribe? Thank you. |
In reply to this post by Marta García-Granero
Hi Vanessa
I'd rather be contacted at the list, if you don't mind... pv> I Want to compute the power of a teste given my sample size, pv> which is 30 pairs, so I will use your formula. This can help you: ************* TO COMPUTE SAMPLE SIZE ********************. MATRIX. * Manually input data *. COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. COMPUTE F0= 1. /* Null hypothesis value *. COMPUTE F1= 2. /* Alternate hypothesis *. COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. COMPUTE Zbeta=-0.84162. /* Replace by -1.28155 if 90% power is wanted *. * Compute sample size *. COMPUTE n=2+TRUNC(4*(1-r**2)*((Zalfa*SQRT(F0)-Zbeta*SQRT(F1))**2)/(F1-F0)**2). PRINT {n+1} /FORMAT='F8' /TITLE='Minimum sample size needed'. END MATRIX. ************* TO COMPUTE POWER ********************. MATRIX. * Manually input data *. COMPUTE n=30. /* Sample size *. COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. COMPUTE F0=1. /* Null hypothesis value *. COMPUTE F1=2. /* Ratio worth detecting *. COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. * Compute power *. COMPUTE Zbeta=Zalfa*SQRT(F0/F1)-0.5*(F1-F0)*SQRT((n-2)/(F1*(1-r**2))). COMPUTE power=100*(1-CDFNORM(zbeta)). PRINT power /FORMAT='F8.1' /TITLE='Observed power'. END MATRIX. Regards, Marta |
In reply to this post by Raghda AlAtia
Hi,
I am asking the same question. Could someone please tell us how to unsubscribe from this forum? Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: Raghda AlAtia Newsgroups: bit.listserv.spssx-l To: [hidden email] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 8:02 PM Subject: How to unsubscribe Hi, I unsubscribed few times, but it never worked! Can somebody please tell me how to unsubscribe? Thank you. |
Hi,
Was reading some document and came across this analysis that i cud not interpret: ... eg 30 people(34%, 95%CI, 1.22% - 6.72%, deff =2.321). my dilemma then is how to work out the deff and the range(1.22% - 6.72%) Regards benard --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates. |
In reply to this post by Willy B. Winata
Willy,
It is curious how questions come back again and again. This one has been explained to you in the welcome message you received when you subscribed, and it has also been explained many times on this list. Write a message to [hidden email], and put the following in the body of the message: UNSUBSCRIBE SPSSX-L Willy B. Winata You may replace the word UNSUBSCRIBE with the word SIGNOFF, at your pleasure. Hector -----Mensaje original----- De: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] En nombre de Willy B. Winata Enviado el: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:36 AM Para: [hidden email] Asunto: Re: How to unsubscribe Hi, I am asking the same question. Could someone please tell us how to unsubscribe from this forum? Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: Raghda AlAtia Newsgroups: bit.listserv.spssx-l To: [hidden email] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 8:02 PM Subject: How to unsubscribe Hi, I unsubscribed few times, but it never worked! Can somebody please tell me how to unsubscribe? Thank you. |
In reply to this post by benard nyakundi
Hi Bernard,
The data in this example must be divided into some sort of grouping. Deff is the design effect. It gives more insight into the power of ICC. It can be used to approximate the effective sample size of a model. It's equal to = 1 + (B - 1)(ICC), where B = avg cluster size If you divide your N by Deff, you get the effective sample size -- how much you can reduce your sample size & still have effectively the same results. I hope this helps. Best, Lisa Lisa T. Stickney Ph.D. Candidate The Fox School of Business and Management Temple University [hidden email] ----- Original Message ----- From: "benard nyakundi" <[hidden email]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.spssx-l To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:04 AM Subject: Intrepretation of deff > Hi, > > Was reading some document and came across this analysis that i cud not interpret: > > ... eg 30 people(34%, 95%CI, 1.22% - 6.72%, deff =2.321). > > my dilemma then is how to work out the deff and the range(1.22% - 6.72%) > > Regards > > benard > > > > > --------------------------------- > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > > |
In reply to this post by Marta García-Granero
Hi Martin
To the list.... write to the list, please :) MS> Hi Marta: I would appreciate it if you could identify what MS> F0 = 1 represents. Wouldn't the Null value be .00. No. Since it is a variance RATIO we are testing, the null value is 1, not 0. MS> Also what does F1=2 represents? Just an example. You might be interested in detecting lack of HOV only if the ratio is over 2 (could have been any other value the researcher is interested in; this was, as I mentioned, just an example). MS> If I understand the syntax for computing sample size you start MS> out with an observed correlation of .578 Again, just an example. This value should be replaced by the estimated correlation you might expect between pairs (in post-hoc power analysis, this value will usually be the observed correlation). MS> and you want to determine the sample size if power =80%. Is that MS> correct. Yes. MS> For the program to compute power you start out with a MS> sample of 20, 30, as a matter of fact. This value is the sample size the study actually had (that's the value Vanessa told me she had, and I used it in my example) MS> a sample correlation of .578, an alpha of .05 and you want to MS> determine the power. Is that correct? Yes MS> Thanks for you help. You're wellcome... but I'd rather give help here, not privately. MS> This can help you: MS> ************* TO COMPUTE SAMPLE SIZE ********************. MS> MATRIX. MS> * Manually input data *. MS> COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. MS> COMPUTE F0= 1. /* Null hypothesis value *. MS> COMPUTE F1= 2. /* Alternate hypothesis *. MS> COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. MS> COMPUTE Zbeta=-0.84162. /* Replace by -1.28155 if 90% power is wanted *. MS> * Compute sample size *. MS> COMPUTE MS> n=2+TRUNC(4*(1-r**2)*((Zalfa*SQRT(F0)-Zbeta*SQRT(F1))**2)/(F1-F0)**2). MS> PRINT {n+1} MS> /FORMAT='F8' MS> /TITLE='Minimum sample size needed'. MS> END MATRIX. MS> ************* TO COMPUTE POWER ********************. MS> MATRIX. MS> * Manually input data *. MS> COMPUTE n=30. /* Sample size *. MS> COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. MS> COMPUTE F0=1. /* Null hypothesis value *. MS> COMPUTE F1=2. /* Ratio worth detecting *. MS> COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. MS> * Compute power *. MS> COMPUTE MS> Zbeta=Zalfa*SQRT(F0/F1)-0.5*(F1-F0)*SQRT((n-2)/(F1*(1-r**2))). MS> COMPUTE power=100*(1-CDFNORM(zbeta)). MS> PRINT power MS> /FORMAT='F8.1' MS> /TITLE='Observed power'. MS> END MATRIX. -- Regards, Dr. Marta García-Granero,PhD mailto:[hidden email] Statistician --- "It is unwise to use a statistical procedure whose use one does not understand. SPSS syntax guide cannot supply this knowledge, and it is certainly no substitute for the basic understanding of statistics and statistical thinking that is essential for the wise choice of methods and the correct interpretation of their results". (Adapted from WinPepi manual - I'm sure Joe Abrahmson will not mind) |
Pardom my ignorance but why are you bringing in a variance ratio (F=1 and F=2) when testing for a correlation.
The correlation is the covariance divided by the square root (vaxX*VarY). What am I missing. >>> Marta García-Granero <[hidden email]> 08/02/06 1:33 PM >>> Hi Martin To the list.... write to the list, please :) MS> Hi Marta: I would appreciate it if you could identify what MS> F0 = 1 represents. Wouldn't the Null value be .00. No. Since it is a variance RATIO we are testing, the null value is 1, not 0. MS> Also what does F1=2 represents? Just an example. You might be interested in detecting lack of HOV only if the ratio is over 2 (could have been any other value the researcher is interested in; this was, as I mentioned, just an example). MS> If I understand the syntax for computing sample size you start MS> out with an observed correlation of .578 Again, just an example. This value should be replaced by the estimated correlation you might expect between pairs (in post-hoc power analysis, this value will usually be the observed correlation). MS> and you want to determine the sample size if power =80%. Is that MS> correct. Yes. MS> For the program to compute power you start out with a MS> sample of 20, 30, as a matter of fact. This value is the sample size the study actually had (that's the value Vanessa told me she had, and I used it in my example) MS> a sample correlation of .578, an alpha of .05 and you want to MS> determine the power. Is that correct? Yes MS> Thanks for you help. You're wellcome... but I'd rather give help here, not privately. MS> This can help you: MS> ************* TO COMPUTE SAMPLE SIZE ********************. MS> MATRIX. MS> * Manually input data *. MS> COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. MS> COMPUTE F0= 1. /* Null hypothesis value *. MS> COMPUTE F1= 2. /* Alternate hypothesis *. MS> COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. MS> COMPUTE Zbeta=-0.84162. /* Replace by -1.28155 if 90% power is wanted *. MS> * Compute sample size *. MS> COMPUTE MS> n=2+TRUNC(4*(1-r**2)*((Zalfa*SQRT(F0)-Zbeta*SQRT(F1))**2)/(F1-F0)**2). MS> PRINT {n+1} MS> /FORMAT='F8' MS> /TITLE='Minimum sample size needed'. MS> END MATRIX. MS> ************* TO COMPUTE POWER ********************. MS> MATRIX. MS> * Manually input data *. MS> COMPUTE n=30. /* Sample size *. MS> COMPUTE r= 0.578. /* Correlation between pairs *. MS> COMPUTE F0=1. /* Null hypothesis value *. MS> COMPUTE F1=2. /* Ratio worth detecting *. MS> COMPUTE Zalfa= 1.95996. /* Replace by 2.57583 if 1% sig. level is wanted *. MS> * Compute power *. MS> COMPUTE MS> Zbeta=Zalfa*SQRT(F0/F1)-0.5*(F1-F0)*SQRT((n-2)/(F1*(1-r**2))). MS> COMPUTE power=100*(1-CDFNORM(zbeta)). MS> PRINT power MS> /FORMAT='F8.1' MS> /TITLE='Observed power'. MS> END MATRIX. -- Regards, Dr. Marta García-Granero,PhD mailto:[hidden email] Statistician --- "It is unwise to use a statistical procedure whose use one does not understand. SPSS syntax guide cannot supply this knowledge, and it is certainly no substitute for the basic understanding of statistics and statistical thinking that is essential for the wise choice of methods and the correct interpretation of their results". (Adapted from WinPepi manual - I'm sure Joe Abrahmson will not mind) |
Hi Martin
MS> Pardom my ignorance but why are you bringing in a variance MS> ratio (F=1 and F=2) when testing for a correlation. MS> The correlation is the covariance divided by the square root MS> (vaxX*VarY). What am I missing. Perhaps Vanessa's original question?: "Power analysis for COMPARISON OF VARIANCES OF PAIRED SAMPLES". I'm not doing power analysis for a correlation coefficient, but for a variance ratio (biggest variance/smallest variance) in paired samples. Since the formula for testing a variance ratio (a t test) includes the correlation between pairs of measures, the formula derived from it that is used for power analysis also needs an estimate of that correlation: (Fratio-1)*SQRT(n-2) t=------------------------ SQRT(Fratio*(1-Rsquare)) Hence, the null value for F under H0 is 1 instead of 0. -- Regards, Dr. Marta García-Granero,PhD mailto:[hidden email] Statistician --- "It is unwise to use a statistical procedure whose use one does not understand. SPSS syntax guide cannot supply this knowledge, and it is certainly no substitute for the basic understanding of statistics and statistical thinking that is essential for the wise choice of methods and the correct interpretation of their results". (Adapted from WinPepi manual - I'm sure Joe Abrahmson will not mind) |
Hi,
Thanks for sharing. Any way, your points of view make me thinking about some thing for my project. Get your ideas first! You can see suggestions at source: Paired comparison analysis Tks and best regards |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |