Hi all,
I have a table of Euclidean Distances for 100 cases (a 100 x 100 table) which I computed using PROXIMITIES. I am looking to present this data visually to identify any clusters of cases that represent groups of similar cases.
Is there a preferred method of presenting a visual map of this data that can be implemented with SPSS 20? Thanks, Adam Troy
|
I may not be understanding the question - what is wrong with Multidimensional scaling plots (PROXSCAL) or with dendrograms?
"I have a table of Euclidean Distances for 100 cases (a 100 x 100 table) which I computed using PROXIMITIES. I am looking to present this data visually to identify any clusters of cases that represent groups of similar cases. Is there a preferred method of presenting a visual map of this data that can be implemented with SPSS 20?" ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Adam Troy
Nobody wants to stare at a 100x100 table . Even if such a person existed the table would be uninterpretable. Natural ways of presenting such would be through a dendogram (see CLUSTER command which reads the previously generated distance matrix created in PROXIMITIES ). I believe you can also get plots through MDS (ALSCAL) but I have not used that in some time. Depending upon the nature of the data, correspondence analysis might provide additional insights.
---
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
In reply to this post by Adam Troy
The answer to that
question depends to some degree on the nature of your data and
who your audience(s) are.
What constitutes a case? I.e., what are the distances between? What are the dimensions (variables usually) that went into the distances? What were they? How were they chosen? How many are they? Why did you choose Euclidean distance? Is there a reason to assume that the dimensions are pretty much uncorrelated? Do you expect to find a tree structure? Or are you looking to construct a single nominal level variable whose levels are the clusters? Art Kendall Social Research ConsultantsOn 7/16/2012 11:08 AM, Adam Troy wrote: Hi all, ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
Thanks everyone. On further investigation it looks like multidimensional scaling works quite nicely for this purpose.
Adam
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Art Kendall <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |