Rake v Rim Weighting

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Rake v Rim Weighting

zstatman
They appear to be one-in-the-same, is this correct? If not, can a reference
(prefer online since access to a walk-in library is limited) be cited.

Tks

WMB
Statistical Services

============
mailto: [hidden email]
http:\\home.earthlink.net\~info.statman
============

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Will
Statistical Services
 
============
info.statman@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~z_statman/
============
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rake v Rim Weighting

vlad simion
Hi Will,

Search the Spss list for the explanations of Jon Peck regarding the
implementation of rim weighting within Spss (without Python module for *rake
*).
http://www.fcsm.gov/01papers/Greene.pdf

Albert, this refference is from one of your posts to the list :) and it was
very helpful at the time I read it. I forgot about it today when I told you
about the Deming and Stephan article. It mentions about the iterative
proportional fitting as a weighting method.
http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=192081 - Graham Kalton and
Ismael Flores-Cervantes (2003).Weighting Methods. Journal of Official
Statistics,Vol.19, No.2,pp. 81-97

Hth,
Vlad

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Statmanz <[hidden email]> wrote:

> They appear to be one-in-the-same, is this correct? If not, can a reference
> (prefer online since access to a walk-in library is limited) be cited.
>
> Tks
>
> WMB
> Statistical Services
>
> ============
> mailto: [hidden email]
> http:\\home.earthlink.net\~info.statman
> ============
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rake v Rim Weighting

Albert-Jan Roskam
Thanks! Actually, I was not aware that IPF is the same as raking (and rim weighting, and multiplicative weighting) Confusing, so many different names for the same technique.

Cheers!!
Albert-Jan


--- On Thu, 1/8/09, vlad simion <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: vlad simion <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Rake v Rim Weighting
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009, 8:36 PM
> Hi Will,
>
> Search the Spss list for the explanations of Jon Peck
> regarding the
> implementation of rim weighting within Spss (without Python
> module for *rake
> *).
> http://www.fcsm.gov/01papers/Greene.pdf
>
> Albert, this refference is from one of your posts to the
> list :) and it was
> very helpful at the time I read it. I forgot about it today
> when I told you
> about the Deming and Stephan article. It mentions about the
> iterative
> proportional fitting as a weighting method.
> http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=192081 -
> Graham Kalton and
> Ismael Flores-Cervantes (2003).Weighting Methods. Journal
> of Official
> Statistics,Vol.19, No.2,pp. 81-97
>
> Hth,
> Vlad
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Statmanz
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > They appear to be one-in-the-same, is this correct? If
> not, can a reference
> > (prefer online since access to a walk-in library is
> limited) be cited.
> >
> > Tks
> >
> > WMB
> > Statistical Services
> >
> > ============
> > mailto: [hidden email]
> > http:\\home.earthlink.net\~info.statman
> > ============
> >
> > =====================
> > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message
> to
> > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no
> body text except the
> > command. To leave the list, send the command
> > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send
> the command
> > INFO REFCARD
> >
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body
> text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the
> command
> INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD