Hello
I have problems to include in SPSS a ranking question. The question of my questionnaire is: Please rank the characteristics and skills that Revenue Management requires in order importance based on a scale 1 to 8 When 1 is the more relevant characteristics and 8 is the less relevant characteristic. And I have these options: Analytical Skills. Communications and sales skills. Formal Revenue Management education Leadership Skills Negotiation skills Reservation background Rooms background Technical systems skills Please somebody help How I include that is SPSS |
Administrator
|
Clearly you will have to Allocate 8 fields (columns) in your data file.
Options: How you decide to do this is entirely up to you and how you intend to analyze the data. a. A given field represents the characteristic/skill and the field contents would represent the RANK. b. A given field represents the RANK and the field contents would contain a code for the characteristic/skill. These data representations can be readily converted back and forth so how you start is really up to you. See VECTOR and LOOP in the FM (fine manual) to sort that. ---
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
In reply to this post by caxa
As was already mentioned, this will need to be treated as 8 separate variables, with each one having a value between 1 and 8. There really isn't a way of easily representing this question in the way that we might logically conceptualize it, so we need to consider what the question is really asking, and be creative in how we treat it.
Ranking questions like this have the issue that, for each variable in the set, the ranking value depends on the values chosen for other variables in the set, as each variable can only have one value. Similar to the selection without replacement principle, and this means too that there are probabilities associated with the ranking choices. However, the number of permutations is quite large, and the interpretation quite dense. When it comes time for analysis, I would consider something like Cluster analysis, which keeps interpretation of the "patterns" in terms of the person that makes the ranking decision. Then cluster membership could be used in any inferential analysis. Even from a descriptive standpoint, you may find that the clusters well reflect the conceptual ranking groups we would expect (Though again, the number of ranking possibilities would be meaninglessly large, which is why I think something like cluster analysis would reduce this down into something more p! opulation meaningful). This is just a thought based on my own analysis of ranking questions. You, of course, will need to make your own decisions based on your own research questions. Matthew J Poes Research Data Specialist Center for Prevention Research and Development University of Illinois 510 Devonshire Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 Phone: 217-265-4576 email: [hidden email] -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of caxa Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:19 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Ranking Question SPSS Hello I have problems to include in SPSS a ranking question. The question of my questionnaire is: Please rank the characteristics and skills that Revenue Management requires in order importance based on a scale 1 to 8 When 1 is the more relevant characteristics and 8 is the less relevant characteristic. And I have these options: Analytical Skills. Communications and sales skills. Formal Revenue Management education Leadership Skills Negotiation skills Reservation background Rooms background Technical systems skills Please somebody help How I include that is SPSS -- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Ranking-Question-SPSS-tp5709826.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
A variation on one of the Conjoint Analytic processes may be of assistance in this case as well.
Dale Dale Pietrzak, Ed.D., LPCMH, CCMHC Director, Office of Academic Evaluation and Assessment University of South Dakota Slagle Hall Room 102 414 East Clark Street 605-677-6497 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Poes, Matthew Joseph Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 9:23 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Ranking Question SPSS As was already mentioned, this will need to be treated as 8 separate variables, with each one having a value between 1 and 8. There really isn't a way of easily representing this question in the way that we might logically conceptualize it, so we need to consider what the question is really asking, and be creative in how we treat it. Ranking questions like this have the issue that, for each variable in the set, the ranking value depends on the values chosen for other variables in the set, as each variable can only have one value. Similar to the selection without replacement principle, and this means too that there are probabilities associated with the ranking choices. However, the number of permutations is quite large, and the interpretation quite dense. When it comes time for analysis, I would consider something like Cluster analysis, which keeps interpretation of the "patterns" in terms of the person that makes the ranking decision. Then cluster membership could be used in any inferential analysis. Even from a descriptive standpoint, you may find that the clusters well reflect the conceptual ranking groups we would expect (Though again, the number of ranking possibilities would be meaninglessly large, which is why I think something like cluster analysis would reduce this down into something more p! opulation meaningful). This is just a thought based on my own analysis of ranking questions. You, of course, will need to make your own decisions based on your own research questions. Matthew J Poes Research Data Specialist Center for Prevention Research and Development University of Illinois 510 Devonshire Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 Phone: 217-265-4576 email: [hidden email] -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of caxa Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:19 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Ranking Question SPSS Hello I have problems to include in SPSS a ranking question. The question of my questionnaire is: Please rank the characteristics and skills that Revenue Management requires in order importance based on a scale 1 to 8 When 1 is the more relevant characteristics and 8 is the less relevant characteristic. And I have these options: Analytical Skills. Communications and sales skills. Formal Revenue Management education Leadership Skills Negotiation skills Reservation background Rooms background Technical systems skills Please somebody help How I include that is SPSS -- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Ranking-Question-SPSS-tp5709826.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by caxa
These may in fact be ratings.
Could more more than one characteristic/skill get the same score? if these are pure ranks, then you need to be careful in interpretation of results. The lowest ranked may still be important. Art Kendall Social Research Consultants On 5/15/2012 3:19 AM, caxa wrote: ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARDHello I have problems to include in SPSS a ranking question. The question of my questionnaire is: Please rank the characteristics and skills that Revenue Management requires in order importance based on a scale 1 to 8 When 1 is the more relevant characteristics and 8 is the less relevant characteristic. And I have these options: Analytical Skills. Communications and sales skills. Formal Revenue Management education Leadership Skills Negotiation skills Reservation background Rooms background Technical systems skills Please somebody help How I include that is SPSS -- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Ranking-Question-SPSS-tp5709826.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |