|
Hi everyone,
This is a bit intimidating, as all of you are so adept at this. I am a doctoral student at University at Buffalo (NY. My team has some questions: We have a Non-equivelent group design, testing a 5 week structured treatment group compared to a treatment as usual group. The population is battered women. This is a two site project. We are looking at the effect of the New Structured group as it compares to the As usual group on 3 measures: Safety index, trauma reduction scale and a self- efficacy scale. So I have 3 continuous variables and one IV. We will take a baseline, post test after completion of the groups and 4 follow up assessments over the next 12 months. Our question is: does the structured group produce greater improvement in reducing trauma sypmtons, increasing self-efficacy, increase safety strategies. We are discussing the appropriate anyalsis to use. One of the questions we have a repeated measures situation so we are assuming that we can use repeated measures. However we are stuck how else we can proceed. We have considered MANOVA, MANCOVA and Regression. If anyone would care to comment that would be great. All feedback welcomed. Cathy Mazzotta University at Buffalo Department of Social Work Doctoral Student ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Cathy,
How many people are in the "treatment as usual group"? Are there more available "treatment as usual" subjects than in the New Structured group? Brian -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Cathy Mazzotta Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 4:42 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: First time asking a question Hi everyone, This is a bit intimidating, as all of you are so adept at this. I am a doctoral student at University at Buffalo (NY. My team has some questions: We have a Non-equivelent group design, testing a 5 week structured treatment group compared to a treatment as usual group. The population is battered women. This is a two site project. We are looking at the effect of the New Structured group as it compares to the As usual group on 3 measures: Safety index, trauma reduction scale and a self- efficacy scale. So I have 3 continuous variables and one IV. We will take a baseline, post test after completion of the groups and 4 follow up assessments over the next 12 months. Our question is: does the structured group produce greater improvement in reducing trauma sypmtons, increasing self-efficacy, increase safety strategies. We are discussing the appropriate anyalsis to use. One of the questions we have a repeated measures situation so we are assuming that we can use repeated measures. However we are stuck how else we can proceed. We have considered MANOVA, MANCOVA and Regression. If anyone would care to comment that would be great. All feedback welcomed. Cathy Mazzotta University at Buffalo Department of Social Work Doctoral Student ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
