Re: Multi-response variables

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Multi-response variables

Silviu Matei
Hi Jan,

I think that you may not be able to do that unless to recode your
variables. For instance, if you have 3 variables var1, var2 and var3. And
currently, they all have value 1 when checked, you will have to recode var2
(1=2) and var3 (1=3). The you can apply the method for multiple analysis
response. The problem is that - in the current state of facts - as all your
variables have the same code (1) - the multiple response procedure can not
distinguish between different answers. This is why the variables included
in the procedure should have different codes.
Hope that works.
Silviu
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Multi-response variables

ViAnn Beadle
I seem to have missed the original post but there are two kinds of multiple
response variables. This user's variables appear to be multiple dichotomies
which work in MULT RESPONSE, TABLES, and CTABLES.

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Silviu Matei
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:46 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Multi-response variables

Hi Jan,

I think that you may not be able to do that unless to recode your
variables. For instance, if you have 3 variables var1, var2 and var3. And
currently, they all have value 1 when checked, you will have to recode var2
(1=2) and var3 (1=3). The you can apply the method for multiple analysis
response. The problem is that - in the current state of facts - as all your
variables have the same code (1) - the multiple response procedure can not
distinguish between different answers. This is why the variables included
in the procedure should have different codes.
Hope that works.
Silviu