|
Dear List,
I have five entry cohorts of children who were placed in foster care during different fiscal years. Specifically, some of them were placed in FY04-05, some of them were placed in FY05-06, etc. There groups are independent because those who were placed in foster care in FY05-06 were not in foster care during FY04-05. I would like to examine the number of mental health services they received during a five-year period (i.e., changes over time). What kind of statistical analysis I can use? Please advise, Lana ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Svetlana,
I think we need more information to give better advice. This paragraph is clear. >>I have five entry cohorts of children who were placed in foster care during different fiscal years. Specifically, some of them were placed in FY04-05, some of them were placed in FY05-06, etc. There groups are independent because those who were placed in foster care in FY05-06 were not in foster care during FY04-05. This paragraph is not. >>I would like to examine the number of mental health services they received during a five-year period (i.e., changes over time). Tell us about how mental health services were recorded. For instance, do you have the start and stop date for each service episode; the services received over the past 'x' many months as in a 'yes, the service was delivered', 'no, it was not' format; the number of sessions, etc. What sort of time unit are you thinking of using to aggregate services? Quarters, semi-annually, annually? Lastly, is service delivery relatively rare, meaning that many kids receive no services (hopefully, meaning they don't need them) in a time unit or do most kids receive services with some getting many and some getting few? Also, I don't understand exactly what you want to know. What I mean is this: is the focus on within-cohort change in service utilization over the followup interval; is it on simply the aggregate number of services used over the interval; is it on between cohort differences; or is it on cohort by time interactions? Gene Maguin ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
