IF that’s true then the different behavior in the UI is just
moot. I assumed that the OP had seen different results and hence the posting.
From: Ornelas, Fermin
[mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:29 PM
To: 'ViAnn Beadle'
Subject: statement
Too
late to take the statement I made on ARIMA. Both mean the same thing, I think
the only thing is one is literally specifying the number of lags and the other
implicitly specifies the lags. The first comes in handy when one wants to
specify non continuous lags, say (1,3) or (2,3) for example. Any way I should
not be writing to the list if I do not use SPSS for modeling.
NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR
CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific
individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is
privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may
be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to
penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information
in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then
delete the original e-mail. Thank you.