|
In the past I have used the outfile command to save regression results to
a .sav file e.g. REGRESSION /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT Y /METHOD=ENTER X /OUTFILE=COVB( 'reg1_a.sav') . Although I am happy with how this works, I would also like to save the Model Rsquared value in addition to the coefficients. Can this be done? I am using version 16 and the previous syntax was developed on version 12 or 13 (it has been a while). Thanks Bill ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
If OMS in SPSS works the same as ODS in SAS, then that would be the way.
Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of William Dudley WNDUDLEY Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:22 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Saving regression results In the past I have used the outfile command to save regression results to a .sav file e.g. REGRESSION /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT Y /METHOD=ENTER X /OUTFILE=COVB( 'reg1_a.sav') . Although I am happy with how this works, I would also like to save the Model Rsquared value in addition to the coefficients. Can this be done? I am using version 16 and the previous syntax was developed on version 12 or 13 (it has been a while). Thanks Bill ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by William Dudley WNDUDLEY
OMS will handle this, saving the appropriate table as a new dataset or in various other formats.
Here's a simple example. dataset declare modelsummary. oms select tables /if subtype='Model Summary' /destination outfile=modelsummary format=sav. <your regression command> omsend. You can put multiple REGRESSION commands between oms and omsend, and they will each contribute to the same dataset. The R squared will be in a variable named "RSquare". HTH, Jon Peck -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of William Dudley WNDUDLEY Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:22 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [SPSSX-L] Saving regression results In the past I have used the outfile command to save regression results to a .sav file e.g. REGRESSION /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT Y /METHOD=ENTER X /OUTFILE=COVB( 'reg1_a.sav') . Although I am happy with how this works, I would also like to save the Model Rsquared value in addition to the coefficients. Can this be done? I am using version 16 and the previous syntax was developed on version 12 or 13 (it has been a while). Thanks Bill ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Swank, Paul R
Hello,
I have been asked about the analysis of data that was originally scaled as a 5 point Likert scale (with a mid point of neither agree/disagree) but has been collapsed into a 3 point scale. The question of interest is whether respondents from 9 hospitals differ in their ratings on these Likert attitude scales. The analysis I was shown was a series of chi-square analyses: 9 hospitals x 3 attitude categories (agree, disagree & neither). The midpoint ratings are not a problem in this analysis but I do have some concern about the number of hospitals. I was considering suggesting that the data not be collapsed and the analyses be based on 5 scale points. If the scale is to be treated as ordinal, then the midpoint is a problem. I imagine that it would need to be re-coded to the first category. How best to deal with the midpoint is my first question. Secondly, is a Kruskal-wallis test the prefrred analysis? I was also considering a logistic regression - though can see merit in the chi-square but have the above concern about the number of categories in both the 3 point and 5 point scale options, given there are 9 hospitals. Any assiatance is much appreciated, regards bob ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
