Simple Effects Analysis SPSS

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Simple Effects Analysis SPSS

Talk Stats
Hi,

I missed this weeks tutorial at my university on how to use SPSS for simple
effects analysis. I currently have a two-way factorial ANOVA. My first
variable has 2 levels. My second variable has 3 levels. My question to you
is, what is the syntax I would use to compare the 3 levels of the second
factor within eachother? I know I may have to use the MANOVA approach. I've
googled this a million times and I can't find a clear cut answer. Can
someone please please help.

James

This question was originally posted at:
http://www.talkstats.com/showthread.php?t=3882

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

General Conjoint Analysis Question

Dale
I have been asked a question that I do not have an answer to here.  I
have checked all my various sources and have drawn a blank.  We
completed a study using a traditional conjoint model (full-information,
additive if it makes a difference).  A reviewer asked us to supply a
statement on beta (or power) in this approach.  Now I understand that we
can do so for analysis of the data post conjoint, and we could address
it as one would a general survey approach.  Is there a specific way to
evaluate power or beta for a conjoint model specifically?

TIA
Dale

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD