This listserv is a great resource, so I was hoping someone might be able
to help me get some clarification on a certain statistical question. If you have risk-adjusted a sample of data by certain factors using logistic regression, is it incorrect to further stratify these results by some sort of grouping variable? I do not believe it would be statistically correct but am having a hard time justifying this. Am I wrong? Any information would be helpful. Thank you! |
Hi Brandon,
If you want to stratify the odds of e.g. having asthma by educational level you could specify your education variable as a categorical variable in your regression model. You will see the odds relative to one reference group, which is dependent on the way you sorted your data. Cheers! Albert-Jan --- Brandon Long <[hidden email]> wrote: > This listserv is a great resource, so I was hoping > someone might be able > to help me get some clarification on a certain > statistical question. If > you have risk-adjusted a sample of data by certain > factors using > logistic regression, is it incorrect to further > stratify these results > by some sort of grouping variable? I do not believe > it would be > statistically correct but am having a hard time > justifying this. Am I > wrong? Any information would be helpful. > > Thank you! > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
More exactly, the odds are computed for each cateogyr relative to one
reference category which is chosen by default (usually the last one) but there are several other contrasts to choose from. Hector -----Mensaje original----- De: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] En nombre de Albert-jan Roskam Enviado el: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:51 PM Para: [hidden email] Asunto: Re: Statistical Question Hi Brandon, If you want to stratify the odds of e.g. having asthma by educational level you could specify your education variable as a categorical variable in your regression model. You will see the odds relative to one reference group, which is dependent on the way you sorted your data. Cheers! Albert-Jan --- Brandon Long <[hidden email]> wrote: > This listserv is a great resource, so I was hoping > someone might be able > to help me get some clarification on a certain > statistical question. If > you have risk-adjusted a sample of data by certain > factors using > logistic regression, is it incorrect to further > stratify these results > by some sort of grouping variable? I do not believe > it would be > statistically correct but am having a hard time > justifying this. Am I > wrong? Any information would be helpful. > > Thank you! > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by Brandon Long-2
Great question. I can't really speak to the statistical aspect--I'm
suspicious it would be violating an assumption regarding structure in the data. I can tell you that in a business setting logistic regression is sometimes applied to a grouping variable (like customer segments). The way we do this is build a separate model for each segment. This is done when we have prior knowledge that suggests different groups will respond differently. Jason -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Brandon Long Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:35 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Statistical Question This listserv is a great resource, so I was hoping someone might be able to help me get some clarification on a certain statistical question. If you have risk-adjusted a sample of data by certain factors using logistic regression, is it incorrect to further stratify these results by some sort of grouping variable? I do not believe it would be statistically correct but am having a hard time justifying this. Am I wrong? Any information would be helpful. Thank you! |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |