|
|
Why dont you use SEM, instead, to handle suppressor variable? A reference is:
Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables: Bootstrapping With Structural Equation Models Gordon W. Cheung and Rebecca S. Lau Organizational Research Methods 2008; 11; 296 originally published online Jul 23, 2007;DOI: 10.1177/1094428107300343 The online version of this article can be found at:
http://orm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/2/296
--Johnny
--- On Wed, 3/18/09, Karen Wood <[hidden email]> wrote:
From: Karen Wood <[hidden email]> Subject: Suppressor variables To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, 18 March, 2009, 8:16
AM
There
seems to be at least three tests that I have come across for suppressor
variables. What, if any, are you using? I have included some output
below.
Karen
Results of
Hierarchical analyzes
Beta
coefficient
X1(numerical
ability)
X2 (verbal
ability)
X3 (fluid
intelligence measure)
Step
1
0.62
Step
2
0.68
-0.10
Step
1
0.62
Step
2
0.70
-0.16
zero-order
correlations
X1
__
0.57***
0.49***
X2
0.30*
X3
Y
0.62***
0.29*
0.18
|
Show off your style with new cool skins. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger 9..0 today!
|