Talk Stats

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Talk Stats

Martin P. Holt-2
I've now seen two postings from Talk Stats. People are sending stats
questions to Talk Stats, and they are forwarding the postings (or at least,
some of them) to this list. They get paid for answering the original
postings.

Is this in line with the list's intentions ?

Martin Holt

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Talk Stats

Mark A Davenport MADAVENP
My sense is that listers generally frown on doing homework for students and responders are generally pretty careful about giving too much information to obvious coursework questions.  In terms of someone else getting paid for a responders expertise, that's right out.  However, I am not sure we will be able to completely screen out such questions. 

 
***************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Mark A. Davenport Ph.D.
Senior Research Analyst
Office of Institutional Research
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
336.256.0395
[hidden email]

'An approximate answer to the right question is worth a good deal more than an exact answer to an approximate question.' --a paraphrase of J. W. Tukey (1962)

-----"SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]> wrote: -----

To: [hidden email]
From: "Martin P. Holt" <[hidden email]>
Sent by: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]>
Date: 02/27/2008 06:04AM
Subject: Talk Stats

I've now seen two postings from Talk Stats. People are sending stats
questions to Talk Stats, and they are forwarding the postings (or at least,
some of them) to this list. They get paid for answering the original
postings.

Is this in line with the list's intentions ?

Martin Holt

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD