Dear all,
I met a problem while using UNIANOVA with a random factor. The data were collected among urban pregnant women using cluster sampling in 2004 & 2006. The sample size seems to be adequate (n=574). The distribution of dependent variable and all independent variables seems to be fine too. But I could not get the estimated marginal means. I don't know what the reason is. I am attaching the syntax and selected outputs below FYI. I appreciate you kind help. Thanks in advance! Syntax is pasted below. *note: dv: dependent variable; year: study year, with values 2004 & 2006; psu: primary sampling unit, about 70 units with number of interviewee varing from 2 to 13; ses: social-economic status*********. UNIANOVA dv BY year psu WITH age ses /RANDOM=psu /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /EMMEANS=TABLES(year) with (age=MEAN ses=MEAN) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=year psu age ses. Selective outputs are pasted below: Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: dv dependent variable Source Type III Sum Mean of Squares df Square F Sig. Intercept Hypothesis 75.172 1 75.172 238.997 .000 Error 56.509 179.661 .315(a) year Hypothesis .000 0 . . . Error . . .(b) psu Hypothesis 40.945 77 .532 2.913 .000 Error 90.005 493 .183(c) age Hypothesis .079 1 .079 .430 .512 Error 90.005 493 .183(c) ses Hypothesis .259 1 .259 1.417 .234 Error 90.005 493 .183(c) a .378 MS(psu) + .622 MS(Error) b Cannot compute the appropriate error term using Satterthwaite's method. c MS(Error) Estimated marginal means are not estimable. |
Hi Hongmei
I'm not really sure, because you don't give details enough of the design, but I think that "psu" (primary sampling unit) must be nested inside "year". Also, if the design is unbalanced, then type I sums of squares are a better choice. Try this modified syntax: UNIANOVA dv BY year psu WITH age ses /RANDOM=psu /METHOD=SSTYPE(1) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /EMMEANS=TABLES(year) with (age=MEAN ses=MEAN) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=year psu(year) age ses. Anyway, with UNIANOVA the comparisons of the EMMEANS will be flawed (the wrong error term is used). Try using MIXED. H> I met a problem while using UNIANOVA with a random factor. The data were H> collected among urban pregnant women using cluster sampling in 2004 & H> 2006. The sample size seems to be adequate (n=574). The distribution of H> dependent variable and all independent variables seems to be fine too. But H> I could not get the estimated marginal means. I don't know what the reason H> is. I am attaching the syntax and selected outputs below FYI. I appreciate H> you kind help. Thanks in advance! H> Syntax is pasted below. H> *note: dv: dependent variable; H> year: study year, with values 2004 & 2006; H> psu: primary sampling unit, about 70 units with number of H> interviewee varing from 2 to 13; H> ses: social-economic status*********. H> UNIANOVA H> dv BY year psu WITH age ses H> /RANDOM=psu H> /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) H> /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE H> /EMMEANS=TABLES(year) with (age=MEAN ses=MEAN) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) H> /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) H> /DESIGN=year psu age ses. H> Selective outputs are pasted below: H> Tests of Between-Subjects Effects H> Dependent Variable: dv dependent variable H> Source Type III Sum Mean H> of Squares df Square F Sig. H> Intercept Hypothesis 75.172 1 75.172 238.997 .000 H> Error 56.509 179.661 .315(a) H> year Hypothesis .000 0 . . . H> Error . . .(b) H> psu Hypothesis 40.945 77 .532 2.913 .000 H> Error 90.005 493 .183(c) H> age Hypothesis .079 1 .079 .430 .512 H> Error 90.005 493 .183(c) H> ses Hypothesis .259 1 .259 1.417 .234 H> Error 90.005 493 .183(c) H> a .378 MS(psu) + .622 MS(Error) H> b Cannot compute the appropriate error term using Satterthwaite's method. H> c MS(Error) H> Estimated marginal means are not estimable. -- Regards, Dr. Marta García-Granero,PhD mailto:[hidden email] Statistician --- "It is unwise to use a statistical procedure whose use one does not understand. SPSS syntax guide cannot supply this knowledge, and it is certainly no substitute for the basic understanding of statistics and statistical thinking that is essential for the wise choice of methods and the correct interpretation of their results". (Adapted from WinPepi manual - I'm sure Joe Abrahmson will not mind) |
Hello,
Maybe somebody can help me with my off topic question. I calculated the standard deviation of 15 single measurements. How can I estimate the standard deviation for duplo and triplo measurements. With regards, John |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |