Hi everyone, thank yo for reading my post I hope someone can help me.
I have a question regarding dealing with unequal sample sizes in AMOS. I want to do a path anlaysis and predict students data from parents data. The predictor variables are datas from parents ((yes/no)dads= 130, Moms= 185; I look at them seperately but in the same model) and the outcome variable are students reports (n=300). I need to keep all the data of the students. Is it possible to estimate the missing parents data? Or will this skew my calculations? How do I deal with this problem? Thank you very much for helping me. |
Administrator
|
Please reread your post and ask yourself whether you have provided sufficient information for anyone to even guess at what you are doing? Much or less provide any useful info to resolve your issue!
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Penny25
I've never used AMOS, and don't have an answer for you. I'm just trying help you clarify what I think you are asking. Given the sample sizes you give below, you must have multilevel data, as follows:
Level 1: students Level 2: Moms & Dads Students are clustered within parents (i.e., there can be more than one student with the same parents), but for some students, the data for Mom or Dad (or both) may be missing, and you are asking what to do about those missing data points. Right? HTH.
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
This post was updated on .
Hello thank you both for your answer. I am sorry if I didn`t make my problem clear.
@BruceWeaver: Thats what I`ve tried to say. Thank you. |
In reply to this post by Bruce Weaver
The data look like this, right?: Student Mother_Rating Father_Rating DV 1 4 3 2 2 2 5 1
3 3 4 3 . . . This is not a multilevel model in the traditional sense unless some students are siblings.
Ryan On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Bruce Weaver <[hidden email]> wrote: I've never used AMOS, and don't have an answer for you. I'm just trying help |
Yes, the data look like this.
I want to do a path analysis. Parents answers as exogenous variables and students answers as endogenous variables. I could do a regression as well, but I would like to try it with AMOS. I had the idea, to do the model one time with estimated missing values and one time with only the students which have father and mother datas and then compare the two models. Is that a way to deal with it? |
This is yet another post that does not match the topic... You asked: "I had the idea, to do the model one time with estimated missing values and one time with only the students which have father and mother datas and then compare the two models." My question: Why did you have this idea? Ryan On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Penny25 <[hidden email]> wrote: Yes, the data look like this. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Ryan
Sorry, I got the wrong end of the stick, apparently!
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |