Nonferrous is pretty conservative. You might want to try Benjamini-Hochberg.
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 29, 2011, at 6:21 AM, "nk" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I have 4 dependent variables and one (fixed factor) independent
> categorical variable. I do not want to a MANCOVA as there is no biological
> interaction with the dependent variables. I want to do a ANCOVA with
> bonferroni correction to reduce the possibility of a type 1 error. On the
> options box of the GLM-univariate tab: I change the confidence interval
> adjustment to 'bonferroni' but do I also change the significance level on
> the same options box from 0.05 to 0.05 divided by the 4 (number of dependent
> variables)=0.0125 which adjusts the CI to 98.75.
>
>
>
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/file/n5107555/for_example.tif.png>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Univariate-analysis-with-a-bonferroni-correction-tp5107555p5107555.html> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Locked
