|
Are there any rule-of-thumb guidlines regarding the amount of variance
explained in factor analysis solutions. [Using >1 Eiganvalue, varimax rotation, principal components,etc] - nothing fancy. Does one accept above a certain % reject below some %? Is a low % indicative of a weak model ? Should one even look at this statistic ? -- Mark Webb +27 21 786 4379 +27 72 199 1000 Skype - webbmark [hidden email] ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
A lot depends on what you are trying to do with the factor analysis.
Create a scale (index)? etc. The subject matter matters. How many variables are there? How many cases? Are the variables selected to represent different domains or constructs? One hopes there will be a few factors that account for much of the variance and many that are not needed. By tradition one does not even extract factors that do not even account for one variable's worth of the total variance accounted for. This is a rule that says there is just no way more factors could be useful. It does not speak to the number to retain.After all, in general factor, analysis is done to represent many variables in as few as makes sense in the circumstance. However, this is just a rule to ease the computer burden. The number to retain in a final solution is a much smaller number of factors. Parallel analysis (search the archives of this list for syntax) is sometimes useful. I some times use a guess for the max possible number of factors to retain 1 variable's worth (eigenvalue of 1.00) more than what would be found in random data with the given number of cases and variables. Art Kendall Social Research Consultants Mark Webb wrote: > Are there any rule-of-thumb guidlines regarding the amount of variance > explained in factor analysis solutions. > [Using >1 Eiganvalue, varimax rotation, principal components,etc] - > nothing fancy. > > Does one accept above a certain % reject below some %? > Is a low % indicative of a weak model ? > Should one even look at this statistic ? > > -- > Mark Webb > > +27 21 786 4379 > +27 72 199 1000 > Skype - webbmark > [hidden email] > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
