Hi all,
I am dubious about which statistical test to use for my research questions. I would be glad to receive your comments. My research question is: Is there any relationship between the Iranian English language learners' language identity and their age, gender, and language proficiency level. The language identity is measured through a validated questionnaire with 19 items. And the language identity included six subscales in the questionnaire namely: 1. attachment to persian language 2. pronunciation attitude 3. language and social status 4. L1 use and exposure in the society 5. language knowledge 6. script Each of the above subscales had 3 to 4 items. Now the first research question will be transformed into multiple research questions including: 1. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 2. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ pronunciation attitude and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 3. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language and social status and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 4. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ L1 use/exposure in the society and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 5. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language knowledge and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 6. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ script/alphabet and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level Now....what do you think would be the best statistical test? Do you think I should use MANOVA? Do not forget that I am after "relation" not "effect". How should I enter the data for each subscale. Thanks in advance to all of you for your kind attention. Saeed |
Hi Saeed,
This seems to be more of a modeling than a Statistical testing to see if there is a relationship. I am going to try to suggest based on what I had interpret from your email. Looking at if there is a relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian
My dependent variable will be Attachment to Persian. Assuming that attachment is scored 1 - 5. My independent variables will be gender, age and proficiency level. I will use a decision tree model to test which are the independent variables that are important to the variable Attachment to Persian. If all 3 of the independent variables are important, the decision tree will allow you to see For a respondent which is
how attached is he to Persian. Warmest Regards Dorraj Oet Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:01:17 +1100
From: [hidden email] Subject: Which Statistical test to use?! To: [hidden email] Hi all, I am dubious about which statistical test to use for my research questions. I would be glad to receive your comments. My research question is: Is there any relationship between the Iranian English language learners' language identity and their age, gender, and language proficiency level. The language identity is measured through a validated questionnaire with 19 items. And the language identity included six subscales in the questionnaire namely: 1. attachment to persian language 2. pronunciation attitude 3. language and social status 4. L1 use and exposure in the society 5. language knowledge 6. script Each of the above subscales had 3 to 4 items. Now the first research question will be transformed into multiple research questions including: 1. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level 2. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ pronunciation attitude and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level 3. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language and social status and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level 4. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ L1 use/exposure in the society and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level 5. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language knowledge and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level 6. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ script/alphabet and their ・ gender, ・ age, and ・ proficiency level
Now....what do you think would be the best statistical test? Do you think I should use MANOVA? Do not forget that I am after "relation" not "effect". How should I enter the data for each subscale. Thanks in advance to all of you for your kind attention. Saeed |
I have already run EFA and CFA on the questionnaire. Actually I have the Likert scale from 1 to 6 for each of the items in the questionnaire, and the gender is male and female as expected, the age group is divided into four 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, 26+, and the language proficiency is also divided into six including basic, elementary, pre-inter, inter, high inter, and advanced.
My first question is: Should I check the relationship between each subscale and each of the above variables? i mean does it sound plausible? And if yes, it becomes very complicated for data analysis. What do you suggest? Thanks |
In reply to this post by Jarrod Teo-2
Thanks for your reply.
Actually I have never run decision tree for my data analysis! I hope I can work out an easier way! Thanks and I will be looking forward to hearing more from the group and you. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM, DorraJ Oet <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Have you tried running a simple crosstabs of your demographics against your scales? Not exactly clear from your email what you’ve got in the way of data, but from your data editor: File > New > Syntax . . then write in: [modify to your own variable names] CROSSTABS gender, age, level by scale1 to scale6 /cel cou row /sta chi. . . Run > all It looks like you need to think of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare more than two groups on each of your dependent variables, but others on the list are better statisticians than me. Get back to me if you need further help. John F Hall (Mr) [retired academic survey researcher] Email: [hidden email] Website: www.surveyresearch.weebly.com From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Saeed Rezaei Thanks for your reply. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM, DorraJ Oet <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Saeed, If I am doing the analysis, I will build decicison trees for all the 6 items using them as dependent variables and gender, age and proficiency level will be the independent variables. It might be interesting to know which of these 3 variables are important to the 6 variables above. Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:45:51 +1100
From: [hidden email] Hi Saeed,
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:01:17 +1100 1. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 2. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ pronunciation attitude and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 3. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language and social status and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 4. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ L1 use/exposure in the society and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 5. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language knowledge and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 6. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ script/alphabet and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level Now....what do you think would be the best statistical test? Do you think I should use MANOVA? Do not forget that I am after "relation" not "effect". How should I enter the data for each subscale. |
Thanks John for your reply. I have already done the descriptive statistics on the items and their related likert scale (providing the frequency and percentage).
A friend of mine said I better use multiple regression but change the research question to prediction. I am still a bit confused! Thanks for your help On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:27 PM, John F Hall <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
Ok
Thanks On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM, DorraJ Oet <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
You can also use nested crosstabs or nested means to investigate changes in part of your dependent variable(s). Helps to understand what’s going on before you get into multivariate modelling. Try something based on this (modify varnames to suit) CTABLES /TABLE sex [c] > age [c] > level [c] BY persian [c][ROWPCT.COUNT TOTALS[COUNT]] /CATEGORIES VARIABLES= sex age level Persian TOTAL=YES POSITION=AFTER . I’m forwarding (off-list) an example from a recent analysis using syntax like the above. You can also do something similar with MEANS. John F Hall (Mr) [retired academic survey researcher] Email: [hidden email] Website: www.surveyresearch.weebly.com From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Saeed Rezaei Thanks John for your reply. I have already done the descriptive statistics on the items and their related likert scale (providing the frequency and percentage). On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:27 PM, John F Hall <[hidden email]> wrote: Have you tried running a simple crosstabs of your demographics against your scales? Not exactly clear from your email what you’ve got in the way of data, but from your data editor: File > New > Syntax . . then write in: [modify to your own variable names] CROSSTABS gender, age, level by scale1 to scale6 /cel cou row /sta chi. . . Run > all It looks like you need to think of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare more than two groups on each of your dependent variables, but others on the list are better statisticians than me. Get back to me if you need further help. John F Hall (Mr) [retired academic survey researcher] Email: [hidden email] Website: www.surveyresearch.weebly.com From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Saeed Rezaei
Thanks for your reply. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM, DorraJ Oet <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Saeed, If I am doing the analysis, I will build decicison trees for all the 6 items using them as dependent variables and gender, age and proficiency level will be the independent variables. It might be interesting to know which of these 3 variables are important to the 6 variables above. Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:45:51 +1100
From: [hidden email] Hi Saeed,
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:01:17 +1100 1. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 2. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ pronunciation attitude and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 3. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language and social status and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 4. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ L1 use/exposure in the society and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 5. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language knowledge and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level 6. There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ script/alphabet and their · gender, · age, and · proficiency level Now....what do you think would be the best statistical test? Do you think I should use MANOVA? Do not forget that I am after "relation" not "effect". How should I enter the data for each subscale. |
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
first crosstab
age, gender, and language
proficiency level.
do you have sufficient numbers in all of the cells to examine the three way interaction? then use glm to do a repeated measures anova using as many interaction terms as your cells sizes allow. The subscales are the repeats. Art Kendall Social Research ConsultantsOn 12/18/2012 2:01 AM, Saeed Rezaei wrote: Hi all, ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
multiple regression is
a special case of GLM. but doing the GLM with a anova with repeated measures aaproach would use
more of the information available.
Also if you have missing data in some of the repeats, you might need to move to multiple level modelling. Art Kendall Social Research ConsultantsOn 12/18/2012 4:39 AM, Saeed Rezaei wrote: Thanks John for your reply. I have already done the descriptive statistics on the items and their related likert scale (providing the frequency and percentage). ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
In reply to this post by Art Kendall
Thanks for your informative comments everybody. I have 1805 participants in my survey.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Art Kendall <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Saeed
Use Chi-Square Test of association... it allows you to test if there is a significant relationship between two or more categorical variables.... Thanks & Regards Alok Kumar From: Saeed Rezaei <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Date: 12/18/2012 08:13 PM Subject: Re: Which Statistical test to use?! Sent by: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]> Thanks for your informative comments everybody. I have 1805 participants in my survey. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Art Kendall <[hidden email]> wrote: first crosstab age, gender, and language proficiency level. do you have sufficient numbers in all of the cells to examine the three way interaction? then use glm to do a repeated measures anova using as many interaction terms as your cells sizes allow.� The subscales are the repeats. Art Kendall Social Research Consultants On 12/18/2012 2:01 AM, Saeed Rezaei wrote: Hi all, I am dubious about which statistical test to use for my research questions. I would be glad to receive your comments. My research question is: Is there any relationship between the Iranian English language learners' language identity and their age, gender, and language proficiency level. The language identity is measured through a validated questionnaire with 19 items. And the language identity included six subscales in the questionnaire namely: 1. attachment to persian language 2. pronunciation attitude 3. language and social status 4. L1 use and exposure in the society 5. language knowledge 6. script Each of the above subscales had 3 to 4 items. Now the first research question will be transformed into multiple research questions including: 1. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ attachment to Persian and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level 2. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ pronunciation attitude and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level 3. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language and social status and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level 4. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ L1 use/exposure in the society and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level 5. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ language knowledge and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level 6. � � � � � � There is no relationship between Iranian English language learners’ script/alphabet and their ·� � � � � � � � gender, ·� � � � � � � � � age, and ·� � � � � � � � proficiency level Now....what do you think would be the best statistical test? Do you think I should use MANOVA? Do not forget that I am after "relation" not "effect". How should I enter the data for each subscale. Thanks in advance to all of you for your kind attention. Saeed ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
Thanks Kumar for your comments but I dont think Chi-square is appropriate cuz the data from the questionnaire is score (interval data) and only the age, gender, and education are transformed into categories. I can use Chi-square if the data from the questionnaire is also categorical like low, medium, and high i language identity. I dont wanna transform my already interval data to ordinal or nominal data cuz it would culminate in missing information.
What do you think? On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Alok Kumar Jha <[hidden email]> wrote: Saeed |
You can use chi-square with anything. See table 2.2 and Fig 7.1 in the statistical notes accompanying the Survey Analysis Workshop on my website. http://surveyresearch.weebly.com/uploads/2/9/9/8/2998485/statistical_notes_2012_draft.pdf John F Hall (Mr) [retired academic survey researcher] Email: [hidden email] Website: www.surveyresearch.weebly.com From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Saeed Rezaei Thanks Kumar for your comments but I dont think Chi-square is appropriate cuz the data from the questionnaire is score (interval data) and only the age, gender, and education are transformed into categories. I can use Chi-square if the data from the questionnaire is also categorical like low, medium, and high i language identity. I dont wanna transform my already interval data to ordinal or nominal data cuz it would culminate in missing information. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Alok Kumar Jha <[hidden email]> wrote: Saeed Subject: Re: Which Statistical test to use?! Sent by: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]>
|
In reply to this post by Saeed Rezaei-2
Do you have age as a
continuous variable?
Gender is a dichotomy so it is okay to treat it as interval variable (like a dummy variable). Since there is only one interval, all intervals are perfectly equal to each other. Also education is at least ordinal. It is usually good to try to avoid coarsening your data. Art Kendall Social Research ConsultantsOn 12/19/2012 12:05 AM, Saeed Rezaei wrote: Thanks Kumar for your comments but I dont think Chi-square is appropriate cuz the data from the questionnaire is score (interval data) and only the age, gender, and education are transformed into categories. I can use Chi-square if the data from the questionnaire is also categorical like low, medium, and high i language identity. I dont wanna transform my already interval data to ordinal or nominal data cuz it would culminate in missing information. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
Age is categorized into
11-15, 16-20, 21-25, and 26+ On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Art Kendall <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
did the respondents have
to endorse one of those categories, or were they asked their age,
and the data coarsened into categories later?
Art Kendall Social Research ConsultantsOn 12/19/2012 7:36 AM, Saeed Rezaei wrote: Age is categorized into ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
The age group were defined a priori and the respondents ticked the related boxes.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Art Kendall <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |