any issues upgrading to v15 from v14?

[Nies, Kim]

Hello,
 
My organization is upgrading to SPSS 15, and I've been looking around to
see if there are any changes that would cause problems working with
data, syntaxes, output, etc. written in earlier versions of SPSS.  I
haven't found anything worrisome so far, but I thought I'd check with
the experts.
 
Thanks,
Kim
 

___________________________________________________________
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable state and federal laws. If you are not the addressee, or are not authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, distribute, or disclose to anyone this message or the information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, immediately advise the sender by reply email and destroy this message.

[Richard Ristow]

At 01:51 PM 3/19/2007, Nies, Kim wrote:

>My organization is upgrading to SPSS 15, and I've been looking around
>to see if there are any changes that would cause problems working with
>data, syntaxes, output, etc. written in earlier versions of SPSS.  I
>haven't found anything worrisome so far, but I thought I'd check with
>the experts.

I am NOT an expert, not on the level you want.

However, there have been persistent reports that version 15 is slower
than 14 or earlier version, enough slower to be a problem on large
runs.

[Claire Loe]

I understand there is a patch that needs to be installed, at least on
the GradPak v.15. It's at the spss.com website.
Claire

On Mar 19, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Nies, Kim wrote:

> Hello,
>
> My organization is upgrading to SPSS 15, and I've been looking
> around to
> see if there are any changes that would cause problems working with
> data, syntaxes, output, etc. written in earlier versions of SPSS.  I
> haven't found anything worrisome so far, but I thought I'd check with
> the experts.
>
> Thanks,
> Kim
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> This message is intended solely for the use of the individual and
> entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable state and federal laws. If you are not the addressee, or
> are not authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are
> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, distribute, or disclose
> to anyone this message or the information contained herein. If you
> have received this message in error, immediately advise the sender
> by reply email and destroy this message.
>
>