Hi,
maybe someone can help me with this problem. I calculated two linear regressions over the same variables but for two groups (boys and girls). Now, i would like to compare the two R square values to see which model explains more variance. Descriptivley the R square value of the one group (boys) is higher than the R square value of the other group. Is it sound to compare these two values like this? If so, how could I show that the difference between the two R square values is significant? Thanks a lot for your help, Dan _________________________________________________________________ Der neue MSN Messenger. Schreiben.Sehen.Hören. Wie im echten Leben. - http://www.imagine-msn.com/messenger/default2.aspx?locale=de Jetzt herunterladen! |
Stephen Brand
www.statisticsdoc.com Dan, First, I would use the regression weights from the boys to predict scores in the girls. Your question is not simply whether the same predictors work as well for boys and girls, but whether the same model (including the weights) works as well for boys and girls. Running two separate regression analyses allows the weights to be optimized for girls. The correlation between the predicted and the observed scores is the cross-validity correlation. The difference between the r-squared for boys and the square of the cross-validity coefficient for girls is the degree of shrinkage in r-squared between girls and boys. You can also perform this operation in reverse, using the girls weights to generate predictions for boys. I think that your question is nested within the larger question of whether your model predicts differentially for boys and girls. I would suggest that you combine the data from the boys and girls, add a predictor variable representing sex to your model, and then add the cross-products between your predictor variables and sex. Use a hierarchical order of entry. After you have entered all of the variables in your model, and sex, enter the interaction terms as a block - in one step. If the R-squared increment for this step is significant, then your model makes differential predictions for boys and girls. The finding of a sex by predictor interaction is consistent with two general possibilities: a.) that the direction of prediction is similar for both groups but weaker for one group compared with another; or b.) that the direction of the effects is different for the two groups. To look into these interpretations, examine the beta weights for the regression equation with the interactions, and plot predicted scores for boys and girls at varying levels of the predictors. HTH, Stephen Brand For personalized and professional consultation in statistics and research design, visit www.statisticsdoc.com -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Daniel Miller Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:56 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: comparing R square values of two regressions? Hi, maybe someone can help me with this problem. I calculated two linear regressions over the same variables but for two groups (boys and girls). Now, i would like to compare the two R square values to see which model explains more variance. Descriptivley the R square value of the one group (boys) is higher than the R square value of the other group. Is it sound to compare these two values like this? If so, how could I show that the difference between the two R square values is significant? Thanks a lot for your help, Dan _________________________________________________________________ Der neue MSN Messenger. Schreiben.Sehen.Hören. Wie im echten Leben. - http://www.imagine-msn.com/messenger/default2.aspx?locale=de Jetzt herunterladen! |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |