errors in the syntax reference pdf

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

errors in the syntax reference pdf

Mumdzhiev
Hi all,

i read some parts of the regression chapter in the syntax reference, on p 1757, a wrong code is pasted i think for the stepwise reg.
Are you Ibm guys collecting such stuff in a topic somewhere, and use it when updating the spss package?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: errors in the syntax reference pdf

David Marso
Administrator
Since page numbers shift from version to version it would behoove you to indicate the version number and even better to actually copy/paste the purported error and indicate what you think it should be?
--
Mumdzhiev wrote
Hi all,

i read some parts of the regression chapter in the syntax reference, on p 1757, a wrong code is pasted i think for the stepwise reg.
Are you Ibm guys collecting such stuff in a topic somewhere, and use it when updating the spss package?
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: errors in the syntax reference pdf

Rick Oliver-3
David is correct, but please note that this list is an independent forum, not affiliated with IBM. The correct way to report an issue with the product or documentation is via IBM technical support.

Rick Oliver
Senior Information Developer
IBM Business Analytics (SPSS)
E-mail: [hidden email]




From:        David Marso <[hidden email]>
To:        [hidden email],
Date:        02/20/2014 10:10 AM
Subject:        Re: errors in the syntax reference pdf
Sent by:        "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]>




Since page numbers shift from version to version it would behoove you to
indicate the version number and even better to actually copy/paste the
purported error and indicate what you think it should be?
--

Mumdzhiev wrote
> Hi all,
>
> i read some parts of the regression chapter in the syntax reference, on p
> 1757, a wrong code is pasted i think for the stepwise reg.
> Are you Ibm guys collecting such stuff in a topic somewhere, and use it
> when updating the spss package?





-----
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
--
View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/errors-in-the-syntax-reference-pdf-tp5724580p5724583.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD