factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

Maguin, Eugene
For people that are using v20 (release 20.0.0) on Macs, have you noticed/has it been noted (not it matters much now that 22 is being sold) that the print det (determinant) yields a blank entry in the determinant object? The background is that somebody did a factor analysis and requested the det but there is not det value but the label is superscripted that the determinant is 0. However, I don't really believe that because the KMO is .740 and Bartlett is p=.000 and rotated pattern matrix has loadings in the .7 range. So, I'm curious.
Thanks, Gene Maguin

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

David Marso
Administrator
ODD!
Looking at the algorithms it would seem that KMO would be undefined (don't we need R inverse for AntiImage matrix) and Bartlett 0.000 in the presence of a 0 determinant.  Mind doing a MATRIX out on the factor and attaching the correlation matrix/means/SDs (MATRIX SYSTEM FILE).
--
Maguin, Eugene wrote
For people that are using v20 (release 20.0.0) on Macs, have you noticed/has it been noted (not it matters much now that 22 is being sold) that the print det (determinant) yields a blank entry in the determinant object? The background is that somebody did a factor analysis and requested the det but there is not det value but the label is superscripted that the determinant is 0. However, I don't really believe that because the KMO is .740 and Bartlett is p=.000 and rotated pattern matrix has loadings in the .7 range. So, I'm curious.
Thanks, Gene Maguin

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

Maguin, Eugene
I know a determinant function is included in the matrix routines. Would that be the only test to check?
Gene Maguin

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of David Marso
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 8:32 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

ODD!
Looking at the algorithms it would seem that KMO would be undefined (don't we need R inverse for AntiImage matrix) and Bartlett 0.000 in the presence of a 0 determinant.  Mind doing a MATRIX out on the factor and attaching the correlation matrix/means/SDs (MATRIX SYSTEM FILE).
--

Maguin, Eugene wrote

> For people that are using v20 (release 20.0.0) on Macs, have you
> noticed/has it been noted (not it matters much now that 22 is being
> sold) that the print det (determinant) yields a blank entry in the
> determinant object? The background is that somebody did a factor
> analysis and requested the det but there is not det value but the
> label is superscripted that the determinant is 0. However, I don't
> really believe that because the KMO is .740 and Bartlett is p=.000 and
> rotated pattern matrix has loadings in the .7 range. So, I'm curious.
> Thanks, Gene Maguin
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to

> LISTSERV@.UGA

>  (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the
> list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to
> manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD





-----
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/factor-analysis-print-det-problem-on-Mac-tp5720804p5720805.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Automatic reply: factor analysis /print det problem? on Mac

Aaron Weis

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office from 6/19 to 6/21 and unable to respond at this time.

 

I will review your message following my return on 6/24.

 

Best regards,

Aaron Weis