|
Is anybody aware of a goodness of fit test, equivalent to the
one-sample chi-square one, for dependent observations? For example, if on a
survey one asks of youngsters what sport(s) they partake in, they are likely to
mention more than one sport: this is a multiple response type of question
(check all that apply). You can’t use the classic chi-square because the
categories (of the variable sports activities) are not mutually exclusive. So
what’s the alternative? If it exists, is it available in SPSS? Thanks in advance. Enjoy the weekend. Dominic Dominic Lusinchi *
Email: [hidden email] ü Web: www.farwestresearch.com ********************************************** |
|
From what you've described, one option would be to run a type of generalized estimating equation (GEE).
If you plan on running a GEE, you will need to set up your data set in vertical format: Person_ID Sport Endorsed 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 . . . N where Person_ID is the ID assigned to each person in the dataset Sport is a categorical, within-subjects variable with k levels (in this example there are three levels or sports) Endorsed is the binary dependent variable where 1=Yes and 0=No The following code should work: * Generalized Estimating Equations. GENLIN Endorsed (REFERENCE=LAST) BY Sport (ORDER=ASCENDING) /MODEL Sport INTERCEPT=YES DISTRIBUTION=BINOMIAL LINK=LOGIT /CRITERIA METHOD=FISHER(1) SCALE=1 MAXITERATIONS=100 MAXSTEPHALVING=5 PCONVERGE=1E-006(ABSOLUTE) SINGULAR=1E-012 ANALYSISTYPE=3(WALD) CILEVEL=95 LIKELIHOOD=FULL /REPEATED SUBJECT=Person_ID WITHINSUBJECT=Sport SORT=YES CORRTYPE=UNSTRUCTURED ADJUSTCORR=YES COVB=ROBUST MAXITERATIONS=100 PCONVERGE=1e-006(ABSOLUTE) UPDATECORR=1 /MISSING CLASSMISSING=EXCLUDE /PRINT CPS DESCRIPTIVES MODELINFO FIT SUMMARY SOLUTION (EXPONENTIATED). There were several assumptions I made when working on this code, but I figure this is enough for now. Of note, I added (EXPONENTIATED) in order for you to see the estimated odds ratios. Best, Ryan
|
|
In reply to this post by Dominic Lusinchi
Thank you, Ryan, for this.
Actually, after some memory jogging, having not dealt with this kind of data situation in a while, I decided that Cochran's Q test is probably the most appropriate for this issue. Best regards, Dominic Dominic Lusinchi San Francisco, California www.farwestresearch.com -----Original Message----- From: rblack [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 6:25 PM Subject: Re: goodness of fot test for dependent observations From what you've described, one option would be to run a type of generalized estimating equation (GEE). If you plan on running a GEE, you will need to set up your data set in vertical format: Person_ID Sport Endorsed 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 . . . N where Person_ID is the ID assigned to each person in the dataset Sport is a categorical, within-subjects variable with k levels (in this example there are three levels or sports) Endorsed is the binary dependent variable where 1=Yes and 0=No The following code should work: * Generalized Estimating Equations. GENLIN Endorsed (REFERENCE=LAST) BY Sport (ORDER=ASCENDING) /MODEL Sport INTERCEPT=YES DISTRIBUTION=BINOMIAL LINK=LOGIT /CRITERIA METHOD=FISHER(1) SCALE=1 MAXITERATIONS=100 MAXSTEPHALVING=5 PCONVERGE=1E-006(ABSOLUTE) SINGULAR=1E-012 ANALYSISTYPE=3(WALD) CILEVEL=95 LIKELIHOOD=FULL /REPEATED SUBJECT=Person_ID WITHINSUBJECT=Sport SORT=YES CORRTYPE=UNSTRUCTURED ADJUSTCORR=YES COVB=ROBUST MAXITERATIONS=100 PCONVERGE=1e-006(ABSOLUTE) UPDATECORR=1 /MISSING CLASSMISSING=EXCLUDE /PRINT CPS DESCRIPTIVES MODELINFO FIT SUMMARY SOLUTION (EXPONENTIATED). There were several assumptions I made when working on this code, but I figure this is enough for now. Of note, I added (EXPONENTIATED) in order for you to see the estimated odds ratios. Best, Ryan Dominic Lusinchi wrote: > > Is anybody aware of a goodness of fit test, equivalent to the one-sample > chi-square one, for dependent observations? For example, if on a survey > one > asks of youngsters what sport(s) they partake in, they are likely to > mention > more than one sport: this is a multiple response type of question (check > all > that apply). You can't use the classic chi-square because the categories > (of > the variable sports activities) are not mutually exclusive. So what's the > alternative? If it exists, is it available in SPSS? > > > > Thanks in advance. Enjoy the weekend. > > Dominic > > > > Dominic Lusinchi > > * Email: [hidden email] > > * Web: www.farwestresearch.com > > ********************************************** > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/goodness-of-fot-test-for-dependent-observations-tp2666 0096p26661631.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
