Hi List,
I’ve executed a logistic regression with two explanatory variables, with the next procedure:
* Modelos lineales generalizados. GENLIN Ydep (REFERENCE=FIRST) BY grupo X2 (ORDER=DESCENDING) /MODEL grupo X2 INTERCEPT=YES DISTRIBUTION=BINOMIAL LINK=LOGIT /CRITERIA METHOD=NEWTON SCALE=1 COVB=ROBUST MAXITERATIONS=100 MAXSTEPHALVING=5 PCONVERGE=1E-006(ABSOLUTE) SINGULAR=1E-012 ANALYSISTYPE=3(WALD) CILEVEL=95 CITYPE=WALD LIKELIHOOD=FULL /MISSING CLASSMISSING=EXCLUDE /PRINT CPS DESCRIPTIVES MODELINFO FIT SUMMARY SOLUTION.
The outcome says that:
It is possible that there is a separation almost complete within the data. There are no estimations of maximum likelihood for the file.
I’ve read that a solution for this is to use a logistical regresión hidden created by Rousseeuw and Christman. Can you guide me if this is a correct solution and if this command is implemented on SPSS.
Thank you very much. Magi |
Administrator
|
This is not an answer, just more information for other list members.
The "in press" version of the relevant article can be downloaded from Christmann's website: http://www.stoch.uni-bayreuth.de/de/CHRISTMANN/ Look for "Robustness against separation and outliers in logistic regression". A document describing the S-Plus package (hlr) can be found here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hlr/hlr.pdf
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |