|
Hi,
I have few questions. Does nonparametric analysis assume linearity? Is there any reason why we shouldn't prefer nonparametric analysis over parametric? e.g. spearman's rho vs. pearson's r Thank you ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
1. There are many non parametric analyses. There is no general assumption
of linearity or non linearity. 2. Parametric analysis assumes errors to be normally distributed, which is a consequence of the so-called Large Numbers Theorem. According to it, random sample estimations of a population measure (e.g. a population mean) tend (as sample size gets larger) to be normally distributed with an average that coincides with the population value. This theorem generates a number of statistical tests, confidence intervals, significance levels, etc. For small samples, or non-random samples, non-parametric tests provide a second-best alternative. 3. Spearman's rho and Pearson's r have nothing to do with parametric or non parametric as such, in the sense described above. One is a rank correlation coefficient, the other a linear correlation coefficient. However, because of their mathematical properties the latter has a normal sampling distribution whereas the former hasn't one, for which rho is called a non parametric coefficient (independently of sample size). Rho measures the correlation of rankings, while r measures the linear relationship between the interval values of the variables. Two variables might have a perfect rho (the highest in X is also the highest in Y, and so on) but a small r if the values do not show a linear relationship but some curvilinear one. The choice is not dictated by statistical but substantive considerations. Hector -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jon Oh Sent: 20 August 2008 20:14 To: [hidden email] Subject: nonparametric Hi, I have few questions. Does nonparametric analysis assume linearity? Is there any reason why we shouldn't prefer nonparametric analysis over parametric? e.g. spearman's rho vs. pearson's r Thank you ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
