nonparametric

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

nonparametric

Jon Oh
Hi,
I have few questions. Does nonparametric analysis assume linearity? Is there
any reason why we shouldn't prefer nonparametric analysis over parametric?
e.g. spearman's rho vs. pearson's r

Thank you

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: nonparametric

Hector Maletta
1.  There are many non parametric analyses. There is no general assumption
of linearity or non linearity.
2. Parametric analysis assumes errors to be normally distributed, which is a
consequence of the so-called Large Numbers Theorem. According to it, random
sample estimations of a population measure (e.g. a population mean) tend (as
sample size gets larger) to be normally distributed with an average that
coincides with the population value. This theorem generates a number of
statistical tests, confidence intervals, significance levels, etc. For small
samples, or non-random samples, non-parametric tests provide a second-best
alternative.
3. Spearman's rho and Pearson's r have nothing to do with parametric or non
parametric as such, in the sense described above. One is a rank correlation
coefficient, the other a linear correlation coefficient. However, because of
their mathematical properties the latter has a normal sampling distribution
whereas the former hasn't one, for which rho is called a non parametric
coefficient (independently of sample size). Rho measures the correlation of
rankings, while r measures the linear relationship between the interval
values of the variables. Two variables might have a perfect rho (the highest
in X is also the highest in Y, and so on) but a small r if the values do not
show a linear relationship but some curvilinear one. The choice is not
dictated by statistical but substantive considerations.
Hector


-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jon
Oh
Sent: 20 August 2008 20:14
To: [hidden email]
Subject: nonparametric

Hi,
I have few questions. Does nonparametric analysis assume linearity? Is there
any reason why we shouldn't prefer nonparametric analysis over parametric?
e.g. spearman's rho vs. pearson's r

Thank you

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD