r-squared

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

r-squared

Mike-704
Hello

I am testing a model and I have a question about r-squared.
I found that when I added an additional path to the model, the r-squared
for the DV increased, even though the path coefficients leading to it
decreased. Can anyone think of any possible explanation for this? I wonder
if it could be related to the standard error?

I'd greatly appreciate any thoughts on this -- or general guidance on
factors taht impact r-squared.

Thanks so much
Mike Wagner
Teachers College, Columbia University

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: r-squared

Jason Ferris-3
Hi Mike,
If by 'path' you mean added an additional variable then the change in r2
would be a result of more information being explained by the new
variable.  The decrease in the coefficients to the previous model would
most likely be the result of the new additional variable having an (as
yet) unmeasured interaction with the existing variable(s).

Also, by adding in new variables it is likely that your total N has
reduced due to missing values in your new variable.  The 'complete case'
analysis may be biased due to the causes of the missing values (this
could have some impact on r2).

Jase

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Mike
Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 1:08 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: r-squared

Hello

I am testing a model and I have a question about r-squared.
I found that when I added an additional path to the model, the r-squared
for the DV increased, even though the path coefficients leading to it
decreased. Can anyone think of any possible explanation for this? I
wonder
if it could be related to the standard error?

I'd greatly appreciate any thoughts on this -- or general guidance on
factors taht impact r-squared.

Thanks so much
Mike Wagner
Teachers College, Columbia University

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This message (including any attachments) is intended solely for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender.
Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,and are not necessarily the views of the Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre Inc (ABN: 17 302 055 629).

<a href="http://www.turningpoint.org.au">Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre Inc</a>

Although this message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses by 'Trend Micro InterScan' at the time of sending,
you are advised to rescan on receipt.

The whole or parts of this email may be subject to copyright of Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre Inc (ABN: 17 302 055 629), and/or third parties.
You can only re-transmit, distribute or use the material if you are authorised to do so.

Please consider the environment before printing this email or attachments.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD