|
Good Afternoon (NY), Preacher and Hayes (2008a) suggest that “bootstrapping enables researchers to use smaller samples than would be necessary to satisfy the distributional assumptions of other methods (although samples should not be too small).” My question is how small a sample can bootstrapping be applied to. I’ve used Preacher and Hayes (2008b) SPSS Macro for Multiple Mediation for a series of simple mediation hypotheses. The samples varied in size from 16 to 29. Is there a minimal sample size mediation bootstrapping? Kind of like a rule-of-thumb. Any suggestions or references will be greatly appreciated. Stephen Salbod, Pace University, NYC Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008a). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder(Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008b). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. |
|
|
From: Salbod, Mr. Stephen Hi Stephen, Thanks for the rule-of-thumb. I had the student I’m working with email Preacher about the sample size in her study. Here is his reply: “I wish it were true that bootstrapping could solve power problems in small samples, but unfortunately it only helps a little. If you have Ns that low you will still probably have low power, but it is also true that as N decreases, the *relative* benefit of bootstrapping over normal-theory methods increases. Regards, Steve From: Stephen J. Toglia [mailto:[hidden email]]
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
