Re: split-half reliability

Posted by statisticsdoc on Dec 04, 2006; 1:40pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/split-half-reliability-tp1072479p1072480.html

www.statisticsdoc.com
Stephen Brand

Dear AR,

This is a very good number for split-half reliability.  I am assuming that
none of the items are redundant (i.e., simply paraphrase each other).

Best,

Stephen Brand


For personalized and professional consultation in statistics and research
design, visit
www.statisticsdoc.com


-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of
AR
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 5:08 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: split-half reliability


Dear list:

    When testing for split-half reliability is it a good number a
Spearman-Brown Coefficient of 0.88?
n=1300. and I have 16 items in my questionnaire.

Thank you in advance.