Hi Bruce.
Click on the link below and go to page 27:
http://support.spss.com/productsext/statistics/documentation/19/client/User%20Manuals/English/IBM%20SPSS%20Statistics%20Base%2019.pdfRyan
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Bruce Weaver <bruce.weaver@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is the second or third time I've seen someone mention z-tests under
> CROSSTABS. I'm not familiar with that--is it new in v19?
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
>
>
> Bridgette Portman wrote:
>>
>> That seems like so much extra work. What about the "compare column
>> proportions" option under "z-tests" in Crosstabs --> Cells? Is anyone
>> familiar with using this? If I am interpreting it right, it allows for the
>> kind of pairwise comparisons I'm trying to do, with the option for a
>> Bonferroni adjustment to the alpha level.
>>
>> Bridgette
>>
>>
>>> If one of the elements remains as 2 levels (e.g., 2 X 3), use logistic
>>> regression, with the 2-level variable as the outcome. Then use
>>> appropriate
>>> a priori contrasts to disentangle the df (2 df in the case of the 3 level
>>> variable).
>>>
>>> If none of the elements are 2 levels, then you need to consider a
>>> multinomial logistic regression.
>>>
>>> Joe Burleson
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
>>> Bridgette Portman
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:00 AM
>>> To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>>> Subject: chi-square post-hoc tests
>>>
>>> I have another question.
>>>
>>> I'm confused about how to perform post-hoc tests for chi-square
>>> contingency tables larger than 2 x 2. I've been reading up on it in books
>>> and on the internet, and there seem to be two different methods advised.
>>> Some say to do multiple pairwise comparisons (2x2 tables) with a
>>> Bonferroni correction. Others say to look at the standardized residuals.
>>> I'm not sure which is the better way. Is there any easy way to perform
>>> posthoc tests on contingency tables in SPSS?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bridgette
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>>
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>> LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Bruce Weaver
> bweaver@lakeheadu.ca
>
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/>
> "When all else fails, RTFM."
>
> NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
> To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Anova-SS1-vSS3-using-v-17-0-tp3412630p3420116.html> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD